Digital Envoy Inc., v. Google Inc.,

Filing 231

ORDER by Judge Richard Seeborg granting 215 Motion to File Document Under Seal. (rssec, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/11/2005)

Download PDF
Case 5:04-cv-01497-RS Document 231 Filed 07/11/2005 Page 1 of 2 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 DAVID H. KRAMER, State Bar No. 168452 (dkramer@wsgr.com) DAVID L. LANSKY, State Bar No. 199952 (dlansky@wsgr.com) WILSON SONSINI GOODRICH & ROSATI Professional Corporation 650 Page Mill Road *E-FILED 7/11/05* Palo Alto, CA 94304-1050 Telephone: (650) 493-9300 Facsimile: (650) 565-5100 Attorneys for Defendant/Counterclaimant Google Inc. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION DIGITAL ENVOY, INC., Plaintiff/Counterdefendant, v. GOOGLE INC., Defendant/Counterclaimant. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CASE NO.: C 04 01497 RS [PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT AND COUNTERCLAIMANT GOOGLE INC.'S MOTION FOR ADMINISTRATIVE RELIEF TO FILE DOCUMENTS UNDER SEAL PURSUANT TO LOCAL RULES 7-11 AND 79-5 Judge: Hon. Richard Seeborg [PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING MOTION FOR ADMIN. RELIEF TO FILE DOCUMENTS UNDER SEAL CASE NO.: C04-01497 RS 2666833_1.DOC Case 5:04-cv-01497-RS Document 231 Filed 07/11/2005 Page 2 of 2 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Having considered Defendant and counterclaimant Google Inc.'s Motion for Administrative Relief to File Documents Under Seal Pursuant to Local Rules 7-11 and 79-5 filed with the Court on July 5, 2005, the Court HEREBY ORDERS that the following documents shall be filed under seal: 1. Confidential unredacted version of Google Inc.'s Supplemental Brief in Opposition to Digital Envoy's Motions to Compel. IT IS SO ORDERED. 7/11/05 Dated:___________________ /s/ Richard Seeborg __________________________________ Magistrate Judge Richard Seeborg -1[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING MOTION FOR ADMIN. RELIEF TO FILE DOCUMENTS UNDER SEAL CASE NO.: C04-01497 RS

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?