Digital Envoy Inc., v. Google Inc.,

Filing 254

STIPULATED AMENDED SCHEDULING ORDER re 253: Discovery due by 12/21/2005. Jury Trial set for 4/3/2006 09:00 AM in Courtroom #4, 5th Floor, San Jose. Pretrial Conference set for 3/22/2006 02:30 PM in Courtroom #4, 5th Floor, San Jose. Signed by Judge Richard Seeborg on 7/28/05. (rssec, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/28/2005)

Download PDF
Digital Envoy Inc., v. Google Inc., Doc. 254 Case 5:04-cv-01497-RS Document 254 Filed 07/28/2005 Page 1 of 7 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION DIGITAL ENVOY, INC., Plaintiff, v. GOOGLE, INC., Defendant. ____________________________________/ Pursuant to the stipulation of the parties filed on July 28, 2005 and good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT: 1. EXPERT WITNESSES. The disclosure and discovery of expert witness opinions shall No. C 04-01497 RS STIPULATED AMENDED SCHEDULING ORDER *E-FILED 7/28/05* United States District Court 11 For the Northern District of California 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 proceed as follows: A. On or before October 21, 2005, plaintiff shall disclose expert testimony and reports in accordance with Rule 26(a)(2), F.R.Civ.P. B. On or before November 21, 2005, defendant shall disclose expert testimony and reports in accordance with Rule 26(a)(2), F.R.Civ.P. C. On or before December 21, 2005, all discovery of expert witnesses pursuant to Rule 26(b)(4), F.R.Civ.P. shall be completed. 2. PRETRIAL MOTIONS. All pretrial motions must be filed and served pursuant to Civil Local Rule 7. All pretrial motions shall be heard no later than February 8, 2006. CASE MANAGEMENT SCHEDULING ORDER Dockets.Justia.com Case 5:04-cv-01497-RS Document 254 Filed 07/28/2005 Page 2 of 7 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 3. PRETRIAL STATEMENTS. At a time convenient to both, counsel shall meet and confer to discuss preparation of a joint pretrial statement and on or before March 13, 2006, counsel shall file a Joint Pretrial Statement in accordance with the attached Standing Order re: Pretrial Preparation. 4. PRETRIAL CONFERENCE. The final pretrial conference will be held on March 22, 2006 at 2:30 p.m., in Courtroom 4 at the United States Courthouse, 280 S. First Street, San Jose, California. Each party or lead counsel who will try the case shall attend personally. Counsel shall comply with the attached Standing Order re: Pretrial Preparation. 5. TRIAL DATE. Jury trial shall commence on April 3, 2006 at 9:00 a.m., in Courtroom 4, United States Courthouse, San Jose, California. In all other respects the Scheduling Order remains in full force and effect. Nothing contained in the parties' stipulation shall operate to re-open fact discovery or extend the period for fact discovery. Nothing in the stipulation shall prohibit any party from seeking to amend this or any subsequent Scheduling Order if it believes that such relief is warranted. IT IS SO ORDERED. DATED: July 27, 2005 /s/ Richard Seeborg RICHARD SEEBORG United States Magistrate Judge United States District Court 11 For the Northern District of California 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 CASE MANAGEMENT SCHEDULING ORDER 2 Case 5:04-cv-01497-RS Document 254 Filed 07/28/2005 Page 3 of 7 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 STANDING ORDER FOR FINAL PRETRIAL CONFERENCE IN JURY CASES BEFORE MAGISTRATE JUDGE RICHARD SEEBORG IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA United States District Court 11 For the Northern District of California 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 A. Required Meeting and Disclosure Prior to Pretrial Conference: At least 21 days before the final Pretrial Conference, lead counsel who will try the case shall meet and confer with respect to: 1. 2. 3. Settlement of the case; Preparation and content of the Joint Pretrial Statement and Order in accordance with this Standing Order; Preparation and exchange of pretrial materials to be served and lodged pursuant to Rule 26(a)(3) F.R. Civ. P. and this Standing Order; and, Clarifying and narrowing the contested issues for trial in order to achieve a just, speedy and efficient determination of the case. 4. B. Joint Pretrial Statement and Order: At least ten (10) days before the Pretrial Conference, unless otherwise ordered, the parties shall lodge and serve a Joint Pretrial Statement and Proposed Order containing the following information: 1. Substance of the Action. A brief description of the parties, the substance of claims and defenses that remain to be decided, and the operative pleadings that raise the issues; 2. Relief Prayed. A detailed statement of all relief claimed, particularly itemizing all elements of damages claimed; CASE MANAGEMENT SCHEDULING ORDER 3 Case 5:04-cv-01497-RS Document 254 Filed 07/28/2005 Page 4 of 7 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 3. 4. Amendments or Dismissals. A statement of proposed amendments to pleadings or dismissals of parties, claims or defenses; Undisputed Facts. A plain and concise statement of all relevant facts to which the parties will stipulate for incorporation into the trial record without the necessity of supporting testimony or exhibits. The parties shall exercise good faith in stipulating to facts that are not reasonably disputable; Disputed Factual Issues. A plain and concise list of the issues of fact that are contested and remain to be litigated at trial; Agreed Statement. A statement assessing whether all or part of the action may be presented upon an agreed statement of facts; Stipulations . A statement of proposed stipulations or agreements that will expedite the presentation of evidence; Witnesses to be Called. A list of all witnesses likely to be called at trial, other than solely for impeachment or rebuttal, together with a brief statement following each name describing the substance of the testimony to be given. No party shall be permitted to call any witness in its case in chief that is not disclosed in its pretrial statement without leave of court for good cause; Exhibits, Schedules and Summaries. A list of all documents and other items to be offered as exhibits at the trial, other than solely for impeachment or rebuttal, with a brief statement following each, describing its substance or purpose and the identity of the sponsoring witness; Disputed Legal Issues. Without extended legal argument, a concise statement of each disputed point of law concerning liability or relief, citing supporting statues and decisions; Pending Motions or Matters. A statement of any motions or matters that must be resolved prior to trial; Bifurcation, Separate Trial of Issues. A statement of whether bifurcation or a separate trial of specific issues is feasible and desired; Estimate of Trial Time. An estimate of the number of hours or days needed for the trial; and, Miscellaneous . Any other matters that will facilitate the just, speedy and efficient determination of the action. 5. 6. 7. 8. United States District Court 11 For the Northern District of California 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 C. 11. 12. 10. 9. 13. 14. Binding Effect of the Joint Pretrial Statement and Order: The Joint Pretrial Statement and Order described above shall recite, directly above the signature lines of each party, the following: CASE MANAGEMENT SCHEDULING ORDER 4 Case 5:04-cv-01497-RS Document 254 Filed 07/28/2005 Page 5 of 7 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 The foregoing admissions having been made by the parties, and the parties having specified the foregoing issues of fact and law remaining to be litigated, this order shall supplement the pleadings and govern the course of trial of this cause, unless modified to prevent manifest injustice. D. Preparation For Trial 1. Exhibits: a. At least (10) days before the final Pretrial Conference, the parties shall exchange copies of all exhibits, summaries, charts, and diagrams to be used at trial other than solely for impeachment or rebuttal. Each exhibit shall be premarked for identification. Counsel shall meet and confer and reach agreement upon a method for marking exhibits (for example, Plaintiff shall use numbers and Defendant shall use letters, or Plaintiff shall use numbers 100-199 and Defendant shall use numbers 200-299, etc.). Unless otherwise ordered, at least five (5) days prior to the commencement of trial the parties shall deliver three sets of all premarked exhibits contained in three ring binders to the judge's deputy clerk. No party shall be permitted to offer any exhibit at trial that is not disclosed in its pretrial statement without leave of court for good cause, unless it is offered solely for impeachment or rebuttal. b. United States District Court 11 For the Northern District of California c. 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 4. 3. 2. d. Motions in Limine: Unless otherwise ordered, the parties shall file and serve any motions in limine at least ten (10) days before the final Pretrial Conference, and any oppositions thereto at least three (3) days before the final Pretrial Conference. Ordinarily, these motions will be deemed submitted without oral argument. Deposition and Discovery Designations: Unless otherwise ordered, at least five (5) days before the commencement of trial, the parties shall file and serve any excerpts of deposition testimony or other discovery to be offered at trial, other than solely for impeachment or rebuttal. (A copy of the designated deposition testimony with page and line references, or the interrogatory response or admission shall be provided). Any objections to the use of designated excerpts and any counter-designations of deposition testimony shall be filed and served prior to the commencement of trial. Jury Materials: a. Unless otherwise ordered, at least five (5) days prior to the pretrial conference, the parties shall file and serve: (1) (2) Jury Voir Dire Questions; Proposed Jury Instructions; and CASE MANAGEMENT SCHEDULING ORDER 5 Case 5:04-cv-01497-RS Document 254 Filed 07/28/2005 Page 6 of 7 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 c. b. (3) Proposed Jury Verdict Forms. Ordinarily, the court will give the standard preliminary jury instructions contained in the Model Jury Instructions of the Ninth Circuit prior to opening statements and will give the standard closing instructions in the Model Jury Instructions of the Ninth Circuit after closing arguments. As to substantive case specific instructions, the parties shall meet and confer and submit jointly an agreed set of instructions, using the Model Jury Instructions of the Ninth Circuit where appropriate. In the event the parties are unable to agree to the language of a particular instruction, the objecting party shall submit a written objection or an alternative proposed instruction placed in sequence immediately following the disputed instruction. The joint set of jury instructions shall be submitted in hard copy as well as on a computer disk in Word Perfect format. United States District Court 11 For the Northern District of California 5. 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Trial Briefs: Trial briefs are optional, but any party wishing to file a trial brief must do so not less than five (5) days prior to the commencement of trial. IT IS SO ORDERED. DATED: October 23, 2001 /s/ Richard Seeborg RICHARD SEEBORG United States Magistrate Judge CASE MANAGEMENT SCHEDULING ORDER 6 Case 5:04-cv-01497-RS Document 254 Filed 07/28/2005 Page 7 of 7 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 THIS IS TO CERTIFY THAT NOTICE OF THIS ORDER WAS ELECTRONICALLY PROVIDED TO: Counsel for Plaintiff(s) Brian R. Blackman, Esq. Email: bblackman@sheppardmullin.com P. Craig Cardon, Esq. Email: ccardon@sheppardmullin.com Counsel for Defendant(s) David H. Kramer, Esq. Email: dkramer@wsgr.com Stephen C. Holmes, Esq. Email: sholmes@wsgr.com Counsel are responsible for distributing copies of this document to co-counsel who have not registered for e-filing under the court's CM/ECF program. Dated: July 28, 2005 United States District Court 11 For the Northern District of California 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 /s/ BAK Chambers of Magistrate Judge Richard Seeborg CASE MANAGEMENT SCHEDULING ORDER 7

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?