Digital Envoy Inc., v. Google Inc.,

Filing 353

MOTION to Compel Further Responses To Digital Envoy's Interrogatories, Requests For Production of Documents, and 30(b)(6) Deposition Notices filed by Digital Envoy,Inc.,. Motion Hearing set for 12/5/2005 10:00 AM in Courtroom #4, 5th Floor, San Jose. (Attachments: # 1 Proposed Order)(Blackman, Brian) (Filed on 10/31/2005)

Download PDF
Digital Envoy Inc., v. Google Inc., Doc. 353 Case 5:04-cv-01497-RS Document 353 Filed 10/31/2005 Page 1 of 2 1 P. CRAIG CARDON, Cal. Bar No. 168646 BRIAN R. BLACKMAN, Cal. Bar No. 196996 2 SHEPPARD, MULLIN, RICHTER & HAMPTON LLP Four Embarcadero Center, 17th Floor 3 San Francisco, California 94111-4106 Telephone: 415-434-9100 Facsimile: 415-434-3947 4 5 TIMOTHY H. KRATZ (Admitted Pro Hac Vice) 6 LUKE ANDERSON (Admitted Pro Hac Vice) MCGUIRE WOODS, L.L.P 7 1170 Peachtree Street, N.E., Suite 2100 Atlanta, Georgia 30309 8 Telephone: 404.443.5500 Facsimile: 404.443.5751 9 10 11 12 13 Attorneys for DIGITAL ENVOY, INC. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION Case No. C 04 01497 RS NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION TO COMPEL FURTHER RESPONSES TO DIGITAL ENVOY'S INTERROGATORIES, REQUESTS FOR PRODUCTION OF DOCUMENTS, AND 30(b)(6) DEPOSITION NOTICES Date: Time: Courtroom: December 5, 2005 10:00 a.m. 4, 5th Floor 14 DIGITAL ENVOY, INC., 15 16 v. Plaintiff/Counterdefendant, 17 GOOGLE, INC., 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 W02-SF:5BB\61451967.1 Defendant/Counterclaimant. The Honorable Richard Seeborg PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that on December 5, 2005 at 10:00 a.m. in Courtroom 4, Fifth Floor of the United States District Court for the Northern District of California, United States Courthouse, 280 South First Street, San Jose, California, plaintiff/counterdefendant Digital Envoy, Inc. ("Digital Envoy") shall move the court pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 37 for an order compelling further responses from Google, Inc. to Digital Envoy's Interrogatories and Requests for Production -1- NOT. OF MTN. AND MTN. TO COMPEL FURTHER RESPONSES FROM GOOGLE Dockets.Justia.com Case 5:04-cv-01497-RS Document 353 Filed 10/31/2005 Page 2 of 2 1 of Documents, as well as the production of persons most qualified to testify on Google's behalf to 2 properly noticed deposition topics. 3 Digital Envoy certifies that it has in good faith conferred with Google, Inc. in an effort to 4 secure further responses and disclosures to these interrogatories, document requests and deposition 5 categories without court action, and that those efforts were unsuccessful. Digital Envoy 6 7 8 9 complete responses to Digital Envoy's Interrogatory nos. 6, 10, and 11 for both AdSense for Content and AdSense for Search; (2) provide full and complete responses to Document Requests respectfully requests that this Court enter an order compelling Google to: (1) provide full and 10 Nos. 14, 18 and 19, including all documents concerning geotargeting for Google's top 100 11 advertisers (including Google's use of Digital Envoy's technology), all communications with 12 Google's top 100 advertisers that refer to geotargeting (including the use of Digital Envoy's data), 13 all revenue information for Google's top 100 advertisers, and all other responsive documents 14 regarding its AdSense programs for Google's top 100 advertisers; (3) designate one or more 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 W02-SF:5BB\61454412.1 30(b)(6) deponents for Digital Envoy's designated topics, noticed on May 13, 2005; and (4) pay costs and fees associated with this pending motion. DATED: October 31, 2005 SHEPPARD, MULLIN, RICHTER & HAMPTON LLP By /s/ Brian Blackman P. CRAIG CARDON BRIAN R. BLACKMAN TIMOTHY H. KRATZ (Pro Hac Vice To Be Applied For) LUKE ANDERSON (Pro Hac Vice To Be Applied For) MCGUIRE WOODS, L.L.P 1170 Peachtree Street, N.E., Suite 2100 Atlanta, Georgia 30309 Telephone: 404.443.5706 Facsimile: 404.443.5751 Attorneys for DIGITAL ENVOY, INC. -2- NOT. OF MTN. AND MTN. TO COMPEL FURTHER RESPONSES TO RFP

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?