Digital Envoy Inc., v. Google Inc.,

Filing 37

Attachment 3
Brief re 26, 27, 28, 29 Request for Order Allowing Surreply in Opposition to Motion to Stage Discovery [Local Rule 7-10(b)] filed by Digital Envoy,Inc.,. (Attachments: # 1 Declaration of Craig Cardon in Support of Digital Envjoy's Request for an Order Allowing Surreply# 2 Exhibit A to Declaration of Craig Cardon in Support of Digital Envjoy's Request for an Order Allowing Surreply# 3 Exhibit B to Declaration of Craig Cardon in Support of Digital Envjoy's Request for an Order Allowing Surreply# 4 Declaration of Brian R. Blackman in Support of Digital Envjoy's Request for an Order Allowing Surreply# 5 Proposed Order Order Granting Request to Allow Digital Envoy's Surreply to Motion to Stage Discovery)(Related document(s)26, 27, 28, 29) (Blackman, Brian) (Filed on 8/24/2004)

Download PDF
Digital Envoy Inc., v. Google Inc., Doc. 37 Att. 3 Case 5:04-cv-01497-RS Document 37-4 Filed 08/24/2004 Page 1 of 3 EXHIBIT B Dockets.Justia.com ˇ ~t23'04 Case 5:04-cv-01497-RS Document 37-4 Filed 08/24/2004 Page 2 of 3 17:10 WILSQ'l SCNSINI ETRICH RC~TI 4 S M SF NDUBZI -- 01 Wilson Sonsini Goodrich & Rosati PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION Date: August 23, 2004 re: P. Craig Cardon Company: Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton Fax: (415) 4343947 Phone: (415) 434-9100 0 0 Usethisfax number ordy Noti~sd snt r before se1~ ir~ nd From: Stephen Holmes Phone; (650) 493.9300 X 3256 Return Fax: (650) 585-5100 Original: ~ To follow via mail Fax Contains; E To follow via cou~er 0 To follow via email ~ Odginal will not follow 2 pages (includftig this sheet). If incomplete, call Purita ~ (650) 461-5220 Message: Please see attached letter Rgf: 21622.514 Return Odginal to: Pu~ta arquaz M Location: BA 1-1 650 Page Mill Road, Palo Alto, CA 94304-1050 650,493,9300 Tel ˇ 650.493,6511 Fax ˇ w'~.wsgr.com Th~ x may contain conlidentai and prMiegod malodni formo sole use of the intended recipient Any TaVIGMI or distibiitian by others ie skiody prohibitod. fe If you are not no intended recipent piea~ ontact the sender end desliOy au copies. c Entire rmnsmietlon Cep~dgntŠ 003 Wul~onSonsini Goodrich & Rosa!I, AU Rights Rasarved. 2 2~581StlDOO(471) 68/23/04 Case 17:10 5:04-cv-01497-RS S1Document137-4 ~TI4 S 08/24/2004 SF Filed Page 3 of O.831 UJILSCt-1 ~1 NI GWDRIa- RO II N3 -- l?02 650 Page MIII Road wiS-'P WiOsonSISonsiniORPORATIiON & Rosati l Goodr ch PR FES ONAL C Pa1eAIto,CA94304.1Q~O www~ August 23, 2004 Via Facsimile and U.S M*iI P. Craig Cardon Sheppard, Mu.llin, Richter & Hampton LU' Four Embarcadero Center, 17th Floor San Francisco, CA 94111-4106 Fax No.: (415) 434-3947 Re: Dear Craig: Further to your email of last Friday and our conversation today, it is Google's position that 2019(d) of the California Code of Civil Procedure applies in federal court, and specifically to the present proceedings in the Northern District of California, See Computer Economics, Inc., vs. Gartner Group, Inc., 50 F. Supp.2d 980 (SD CA, 1999). It seems reasonable to us that a plaintiff in a trade secret case must identify its alleged trade secrets before it commences discovery, which is what 2019(d) clearly requires. We would like for this not to be an issue, which is why I called the matter to your attention. Please therefore identi~' igital Envoy's trade secrets with reasonable particularity as soon as possible. D Very truly yours, WILSON SONSINI GOODRICH & ROSATI Digital Envoy~ nc. v. Google Inc. I Case No,: C 04-01497 ItS ~ cc. Timothy H. JCratz, MeGuireWoods LLP Professional Corporation Stephen C. Holmes CANrportbftPAL1Sl\PtTh~P.25)9f?Lu.DOC PALO ALTO AIJSIJN ~l$&l~I.aNO N5W TOUT RESTON SALT LA!O1 CItY MN eRANcrsco

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?