Digital Envoy Inc., v. Google Inc.,

Filing 397

ORDER by Judge Richard Seeborg granting 392 Motion to Seal Document. (rssec, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/16/2005)

Download PDF
4 Case 5:04-cv-01497-RS Document 397 C Filed 12/16/2005 Page 1 of 2 P. CRAIG CARDON, Cal . Bar No. 168646 BRIAN R . BLACKMAN, Cal . Bar No. 196996 SHEPPARD, MULLIN, RICHTER & HAMPTON LLP Four Embarcadero Center, 17th Floor San Francisco, California 94111-4106 Telephone : 15-434-9100 Facsimile : 15-434-394 7 TIMOTHY H . KRATZ (Admitted Pro Hac Vice) LUKE ANDERSON (Admitted Pro Hac Vice) MCGUIRE WOODS, L .L. P 1170 Peachtree Street, N.E., Suite 2100 Atlanta, Georgia 3030 9 Telephone : 404 .443 .5500 Facsimile : 404.443 .575 1 Attorneys for DIGITAL ENVOY, INC . *E-FILED 12/16/05* UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION DIGITAL ENVOY, INC ., Plaintiff/Counter defendant , V. ase No. C 04 01497 RS [PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING DIGITAL ENVOY'S MISCELLANEOUS ADMINISTRATIVE REQUEST TO FILE UNDER SEAL, PURSUANT TO LOCAL RULES 7-11 AND 79-5, THE DECLARATION OF ROBERT J . WADDELL IN SUPPORT OF DIGITAL ENVOY'S OPPOSITION TO GOOGLE'S MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATIO N GOOGLE, INC ., Defendant/Counterclaimant . -1 W02-SF :51313161478216 .1 f PROPOSED) ORDER GRANTING DIGITAL ENVOY'S ADM IN. REQUEST TO FILE WADDELL DEC . UNDER SEAL . [ Case 5:04-cv-01497-RS Document 397 Filed 12/16/2005 Page 2 of 2 1 2 Having considered Plaintiff Digital Envoy's Miscellaneous Administrative Request to File Under Seal, Pursuant to Local Rules 7-11 and 79-5, the Declaration Of Robert J . Waddell in support of Digital Envoy's Opposition to Google's Motion for Reconsideration, lodged with the Court on December 7, 2005, the Court HEREBY ORDERS that the Waddell Declaration be filed under seal . 14 DATED : December , 2005 7 By /s/ Richard Seeborg The Honorable Richard Seeborg United States Magistrate Judg e W02-SR5 1313161478216 .1 PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING DIGITAL ENVOY'S ADMIN . REQUEST TO FILE WADDELL DEC. UNDER SEAL.

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?