Digital Envoy Inc., v. Google Inc.,

Filing 404

JUDGMENT in favor of Defendant, Google, Inc., against Plaintiff, Digital Envoy, Inc. Signed by Judge Richard Seeborg on 1/24/06. (rssec, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/24/2006)

Download PDF
Digital Envoy Inc., v. Google Inc., Doc. 404 Case 5:04-cv-01497-RS Document 404 Filed 01/24/2006 Page 1 of 2 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION DIGITAL ENVOY, INC., v. Plaintiff, NO. 04-cv-1497 RS JUDGMENT *E-FILED 1/24/06* United States District Court 11 For the Northern District of California 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 GOOGLE, INC., Defendant. / Based on the orders issued on November 8, 2005 and January 24, 2006, granting the summary judgment motion regarding damages filed by defendant Google, Inc. ("Google"), the Court enters judgment in favor of Google and against plaintiff Digital Envoy, Inc. ("Digital") in the aboveentitled action. IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: 1/24/06 RICHARD SEEBORG United States Magistrate Judge Dockets.Justia.com Case 5:04-cv-01497-RS Document 404 Filed 01/24/2006 Page 2 of 2 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 THIS IS TO CERTIFY THAT NOTICE OF THIS ORDER WAS ELECTRONICALLY PROVIDED TO: Brian R. Blackman P. Craig Cardon bblackman@sheppardmullin.com ccardon@sheppardmullin.com, msariano@sheppardmullin.com tgraves@wsgr.com sholmes@wsgr.com, pmarquez@wsgr.com dkramer@wsgr.com, dgrubbs@wsgr.com mkwun@google.com dlansky@wsgr.com Charles Tait Graves Stephen C. Holmes David H. Kramer Michael S. Kwun David L. Lansky Chan S. Park cpark@wsgr.com United States District Court 11 For the Northern District of California Counsel are responsible for distributing copies of this document to co-counsel who have not registered for e-filing under the Court's CM/ECF program. Dated: 1/24/06 Chambers of Judge Richard Seeborg By: /s/ BAK 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?