Digital Envoy Inc., v. Google Inc.,

Filing 410

Digital Envoy Inc., v. Google Inc.,

Doc. 410

Case 5:04-cv-01497-RS

Document 410

Filed 02/15/2006

Page 1 of 4

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

DAVID H. KRAMER, State Bar No. 168452 ([e-mail]) COLLEEN BAL, State Bar No. 167637 ([e-mail]) DAVID L. LANSKY, State Bar No. 199952 ([e-mail]) WILSON SONSINI GOODRICH & ROSATI Professional Corporation 650 Page Mill Road Palo Alto, CA 94304-1050 Telephone: [phone] Facsimile: [phone] Attorneys for Defendant/Counterclaimant Google Inc. P. CRAIG CARDON, State Bar No. 168646 BRIAN R. BLACKMAN, State Bar No. 196996 KENDALL M. BURTON, State Bar No. 228720 SHEPPARD, MULLIN, RICHTER & HAMPTON LLP Four Embarcadero Center, 17th Floor San Francisco, California 94111-4106 Telephone: [phone] Facsimile: [phone] TIMOTHY H. KRATZ, (Admitted Pro Hac Vice) LUKE ANDERSON, (Admitted Pro Hac Vice) MCGUIRE WOODS, LLP 1170 Peachtree Street, N.E., Suite 2100 Atlanta, Georgia 30309 Telephone: [phone] Facsimile: [phone] Attorneys for Plaintiff/Counterdefendant, Digital Envoy, Inc. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION

DIGITAL ENVOY, INC., Plaintiff/Counterdefendant, v. GOOGLE INC., Defendant/Counterclaimant.

) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

CASE NO.: C 04 01497 RS STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RE: AMENDING SCHEDULING ORDER

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] RE : AMENDING SCHEDULING ORDER C 04 01497 RS

C:\NrPortbl\PALIB1\DAG\2817903_2.DOC

Dockets.Justia.com

Case 5:04-cv-01497-RS

Document 410

Filed 02/15/2006

Page 2 of 4

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

Google Inc. ("Google") and Digital Envoy, Inc. ("Digital Envoy") submit, through their counsel of record, this stipulation and proposed order to amend the Case Scheduling Order entered by the Court on this matter on August 27, 2004, and amended by Orders of the Court on October 21, 2005 and December 5, 2005. In light of the resolution of Digital Envoy's claims in the action and the pendency of Google's counterclaims, the parties propose these amendments to the Scheduling Order in the interests of efficiency and economy: 1. EXPERT WITNESSES. The disclosure and discovery of expert witness opinions

shall proceed as follows: a. On or before April 28, 2006, defendant shall disclose expert testimony and reports in accordance with Rule 26(a)(2), F.R. Civ. P. b. On or before May 29, 2006, plaintiff shall disclose expert testimony and reports in accordance with Rule 26(a)(2), F.R. Civ. P. c. On or before June 23, 2006, all discovery of expert witnesses pursuant to Rule 26(b)(4), F.R. Civ. P. shall be completed. 2. PRETRIAL MOTIONS. All pretrial motions must be filed and served pursuant to

Civil Local Rule 7. All pretrial motions shall be heard no later than August 16, 2006. 3. PRETRIAL STATEMENTS. At a time convenient to both, counsel shall meet

and confer to discuss preparation of joint pretrial statement and on or before September 6, 2006, counsel shall file a Joint Pretrial Statement in accordance with the Court's Standing Order re: Pretrial Preparation. 4. PRETRIAL CONFERENCE. The final conference will be held on

___________________. Each party or lead counsel who will try the case shall attend personally. Counsel shall comply with the Court's Standing Order re: Pretrial Preparation. 5. TRIAL DATE. Jury trial shall commence on ________________.

In all other respects, the Scheduling Order remains in full force and effect. Nothing contained in the parties' stipulation shall operate to re-open fact discovery or extend the period

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] RE : AMENDING SCHEDULING ORDER C 04 01497 RS

1

C:\NrPortbl\PALIB1\DAG\2817903_2.DOC

Case 5:04-cv-01497-RS

Document 410

Filed 02/15/2006

Page 3 of 4

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

for fact discovery. Nothing in the stipulation shall prohibit any party from seeking to amend this or any subsequent Scheduling Order it is believes that such relief is warranted.

Dated: February 15, 2006

MCGUIRE WOODS, LLP By: /s/ Timothy H. Kratz Timothy H. Kratz Attorneys for Plaintiff and Counterdefendant DIGITAL ENVOY, INC.

Dated: February 15, 2006

WILSON SONSINI GOODRICH & ROSATI Professional Corporation By: /s/ David H. Kramer David H. Kramer Attorneys for Defendant and Counterclaimant GOOGLE INC.

ORDER PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated:_____________, 2006

____________________________________ HONORABLE RICHARD SEEBORG UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] RE : AMENDING SCHEDULING ORDER C 04 01497 RS

2

C:\NrPortbl\PALIB1\DAG\2817903_2.DOC

Case 5:04-cv-01497-RS

Document 410

Filed 02/15/2006

Page 4 of 4

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] RE : AMENDING SCHEDULING ORDER C 04 01497 RS

CERTIFICATION I, David H. Kramer, am the ECF User whose identification and password are being used to file the STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RE: AMENDING SCHEDULING ORDER. In compliance with General Order 45.X.B, I hereby attest that all parties have concurred in this filing.

DATED: February 16, 2006

WILSON SONSINI GOODRICH & ROSATI Professional Corporation

By:

/s/ David H. Kramer David H. Kramer

Attorneys for Defendant / Counterclaimant GOOGLE INC.

3

C:\NrPortbl\PALIB1\DAG\2817903_2.DOC