Digital Envoy Inc., v. Google Inc.,

Filing 418

Digital Envoy Inc., v. Google Inc.,

Doc. 418

Case 5:04-cv-01497-RS

Document 418

Filed 04/11/2006

Page 1 of 4

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

DAVID H. KRAMER, State Bar No. 168452 ([e-mail]) COLLEEN BAL, State Bar No. 167637 ([e-mail]) DAVID L. LANSKY, State Bar No. 199952 ([e-mail]) WILSON SONSINI GOODRICH & ROSATI Professional Corporation 650 Page Mill Road Palo Alto, CA 94304-1050 Telephone: [phone] Facsimile: [phone] Attorneys for Defendant/Counterclaimant Google Inc. P. CRAIG CARDON, State Bar No. 168646 BRIAN R. BLACKMAN, State Bar No. 196996 KENDALL M. BURTON, State Bar No. 228720 SHEPPARD, MULLIN, RICHTER & HAMPTON LLP Four Embarcadero Center, 17th Floor San Francisco, California 94111-4106 Telephone: [phone] Facsimile: [phone] TIMOTHY H. KRATZ, (Admitted Pro Hac Vice) LUKE ANDERSON, (Admitted Pro Hac Vice) ROBERT J. WADDELL, JR. (Admitted Pro Hac Vice) MCGUIREWOODS LLP 1170 Peachtree Street N.E., Suite 2100 Atlanta, Georgia 30309 Telephone: [phone] Facsimile: [phone] Attorneys for Plaintiff/Counterdefendant, Digital Envoy, Inc. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION

DIGITAL ENVOY, INC., Plaintiff/Counterdefendant, v. GOOGLE INC., Defendant/Counterclaimant.

) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

CASE NO.: C 04 01497 RS STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RE: AMENDING SCHEDULING ORDER

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] RE : AMENDING SCHEDULING ORDER C 04 01497 RS

C:\NrPortbl\PALIB1\NVG\2857023_1.DOC

Dockets.Justia.com

Case 5:04-cv-01497-RS

Document 418

Filed 04/11/2006

Page 2 of 4

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

Google Inc. ("Google") and Digital Envoy, Inc. ("Digital Envoy") submit, through their counsel of record, this stipulation and proposed order to amend the Case Scheduling Order entered by the Court on this matter on August 27, 2004, and amended by Orders of the Court on October 21, 2005, December 5, 2005 and March 28, 2006. In light of the resolution of Digital Envoy's claims in the action and the pendency of Google's counterclaims, the parties propose these amendments to the Scheduling Order in the interests of efficiency and economy: 1. EXPERT WITNESSES. The disclosure and discovery of expert witness opinions

shall proceed as follows: a. On or before April 28, 2006, defendant shall disclose expert testimony and reports in accordance with Rule 26(a)(2), F.R. Civ. P. b. The deposition of defendant's expert is scheduled to take place on May 16, 2006. c. On or before May 19, 2006, plaintiff shall disclose expert testimony and reports in accordance with Rule 26(a)(2), F.R. Civ. P. d. The deposition of plaintiff's expert will take place during the week of May 22, 2006. e. On or before June 1, 2006, all discovery of expert witnesses pursuant to Rule 26(b)(4), F.R. Civ. P. shall be completed. f. The parties may serve subpoenas on the opposing party's expert in advance of the deadline for that expert's deposition, and the production of documents in response to such subpoena will take place on or before the date the expert's deposition is to take place. The parties are not required to produce communications with the expert or draft reports. g. Any pretrial motions concerning experts must be filed by June 2, 2006, with any opposition due June 5, 2005 and will be deemed submitted on the papers.

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] RE : AMENDING SCHEDULING ORDER C 04 01497 RS

1

C:\NrPortbl\PALIB1\NVG\2857023_1.DOC

Case 5:04-cv-01497-RS

Document 418

Filed 04/11/2006

Page 3 of 4

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

2.

In all other respects, the Scheduling Order remains in full force and effect.

Nothing contained in the parties' stipulation shall operate to re-open fact discovery or extend the period for fact discovery. Nothing in the stipulation shall prohibit any party from seeking to amend this or any subsequent Scheduling Order it is believes that such relief is warranted.

Dated: April 11, 2006

MCGUIREWOODS LLP By: /s/ Timothy H. Kratz Timothy H. Kratz Attorneys for Plaintiff and Counterdefendant DIGITAL ENVOY, INC.

Dated: April 11, 2006

WILSON SONSINI GOODRICH & ROSATI Professional Corporation By: /s/ David L. Lansky David L. Lansky Attorneys for Defendant and Counterclaimant GOOGLE INC.

ORDER PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated:_____________, 2006

____________________________________ HONORABLE RICHARD SEEBORG UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] RE : AMENDING SCHEDULING ORDER C 04 01497 RS

2

C:\NrPortbl\PALIB1\NVG\2857023_1.DOC

Case 5:04-cv-01497-RS

Document 418

Filed 04/11/2006

Page 4 of 4

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] RE : AMENDING SCHEDULING ORDER C 04 01497 RS

CERTIFICATION I, David L. Lansky, am the ECF User whose identification and password are being used to file the STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RE: AMENDING SCHEDULING ORDER. In compliance with General Order 45.X.B, I hereby attest that all parties have concurred in this filing.

DATED: April 11, 2006

WILSON SONSINI GOODRICH & ROSATI Professional Corporation

By:

/s/ David L. Lansky David L. Lansky

Attorneys for Defendant / Counterclaimant GOOGLE INC.

3

C:\NrPortbl\PALIB1\NVG\2857023_1.DOC