Digital Envoy Inc., v. Google Inc.,

Filing 441

STIPULATION of Dismissal with Prejudice by Google Inc.,, Google Inc.,. (Lansky, David) (Filed on 4/24/2006)

Download PDF
Digital Envoy Inc., v. Google Inc., Doc. 441 Case 5:04-cv-01497-RS Document 441 Filed 04/24/2006 Page 1 of 3 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 DAVID H. KRAMER, State Bar No. 168452 (dkramer@wsgr.com) COLLEEN BAL, State Bar No. 167637 (cbal@wsgr.com) DAVID L. LANSKY, State Bar No. 199952 (dlansky@wsgr.com) WILSON SONSINI GOODRICH & ROSATI Professional Corporation 650 Page Mill Road Palo Alto, CA 94304-1050 Telephone: (650) 493-9300 Facsimile: (650) 565-5100 Attorneys for Defendant/Counterclaimant Google Inc. P. CRAIG CARDON, State Bar No. 168646 BRIAN R. BLACKMAN, State Bar No. 196996 KENDALL M. BURTON, State Bar No. 228720 SHEPPARD, MULLIN, RICHTER & HAMPTON LLP Four Embarcadero Center, 17th Floor San Francisco, California 94111-4106 Telephone: (415) 434-9100 Facsimile: (415) 434-3947 TIMOTHY H. KRATZ, (Admitted Pro Hac Vice) LUKE ANDERSON, (Admitted Pro Hac Vice) ROBERT J. WADDELL, JR. (Admitted Pro Hac Vice) MCGUIREWOODS LLP 1170 Peachtree Street N.E., Suite 2100 Atlanta, Georgia 30309 Telephone: (404) 443-5500 Facsimile: (404) 443-5751 Attorneys for Plaintiff/Counterdefendant, Digital Envoy, Inc. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION DIGITAL ENVOY, INC., Plaintiff/Counterdefendant, v. GOOGLE INC., Defendant/Counterclaimant. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CASE NO.: C 04 01497 RS STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE C 04 01497 RS C:\Documents and Settings\nvg\Local Settings\Temporary Internet Files\OLK11\Stipulation of dismissal with prejudice.DOC Dockets.Justia.com Case 5:04-cv-01497-RS Document 441 Filed 04/24/2006 Page 2 of 3 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Plaintiff/counterdefendant Digital Envoy, Inc. ("Digital Envoy") and defendant/ counterclaimant Google Inc. ("Google") hereby stipulate, pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1) and 41(c), as follows: (1) Digital Envoy's claims against Google are dismissed with prejudice; (2) Google's counterclaims against Digital Envoy are dismissed with prejudice; (3) Each party bears its own costs and fees; and (4) Each party hereby waives its right of appeal. Dated: April 24, 2006 MCGUIREWOODS LLP By: /s/ Timothy H. Kratz Timothy H. Kratz Attorneys for Plaintiff and Counterdefendant DIGITAL ENVOY, INC. Dated: April 24, 2006 WILSON SONSINI GOODRICH & ROSATI Professional Corporation By: /s/ David L. Lansky David L. Lansky Attorneys for Defendant and Counterclaimant GOOGLE INC. ORDER PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated:_____________, 2006 ____________________________________ HONORABLE RICHARD SEEBORG UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE C 04 01497 RS 1 C:\Documents and Settings\nvg\Local Settings\Temporary Internet Files\OLK11\Stipulation of dismissal with prejudice.DOC Case 5:04-cv-01497-RS Document 441 Filed 04/24/2006 Page 3 of 3 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE C 04 01497 RS CERTIFICATION I, David L. Lansky, am the ECF User whose identification and password are being used to file the STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE. In compliance with General Order 45.X.B, I hereby attest that all parties have concurred in this filing. DATED: April 24, 2006 WILSON SONSINI GOODRICH & ROSATI Professional Corporation By: /s/ David L. Lansky David L. Lansky Attorneys for Defendant / Counterclaimant GOOGLE INC. 2 C:\Documents and Settings\nvg\Local Settings\Temporary Internet Files\OLK11\Stipulation of dismissal with prejudice.DOC

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?