Digital Envoy Inc., v. Google Inc.,

Filing 8

Proposed Order re 7 Motion to Dimiss For Improper Venue, or in the Alternative, to Stay by Digital Envoy,Inc.,. (Cardon, P.) (Filed on 5/10/2004)

Download PDF
Digital Envoy Inc., v. Google Inc., Doc. 8 Case 5:04-cv-01497-RS Document 8 Filed 05/10/2004 Page 1 of 2 1 P. CRAIG CARDON, Cal. Bar No. 168646 3 Four Embarcadero Center, 17th Floor 4 Telephone: 5 2 KENDALL M. BURTON, Cal. Bar No. 228720 San Francisco, California 94111-4106 415-434-9100 Facsimile: 415-434-3947 BRIAN R. BLACKMAN, Cal. Bar No. 196996 SHEPPARD, MULLIN, RICHTER & HAMPTON LLP 6 TIMOTHY H. KRATZ (Pro Hac Vice To Be Applied For) 7 MCGUIRE WOODS, L.L.P 8 Atlanta, Georgia 30309 9 Facsimile: 404.443.5751 11 12 13 14 GOOGLE, INC., 15 16 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 v. Plaintiff, Telephone: 404.443.5500 LUKE ANDERSON (Pro Hac Vice To Be Applied For) 1170 Peachtree Street, N.E., Suite 2100 10 Attorneys for DIGITAL ENVOY, INC. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION Case No. C 04 01497 RS [Proposed] ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO DISMISS FOR IMPROPER VENUE 17 DIGITAL ENVOY, INC., Defendant. DIGITAL ENVOY, INC., Counterclaimant, v. GOOGLE, INC., Counterdefendant. The motion of Defendant Counterclaimant Digital Envoy, Inc. ("Digital 26 Envoy" or "Defendant") to dismiss this action for improper venue based on the first 27 to file rule came on for hearing at 9:30 a.m. on June 16, 2004, before the Honorable 28 Richard Seeborg. Alternatively, Digital Envoy moved to stay this action until the -1W02-SF:5BB\61412866.1 ORDER . Case No. C 04 01497 RS Dockets.Justia.com Case 5:04-cv-01497-RS Document 8 Filed 05/10/2004 Page 2 of 2 1 Plaintiff Counterdefendant Google, Inc.'s ("Google" or "Plaintiff") motion to dismiss or 2 transfer, pending in a different action between the same parties entitled Digital Envoy, 3 Inc. v. Google, Inc., Case No. 1:04-CV-0864-CAP, is resolved. Counsel, as stated in the 4 record, appeared on behalf of each party. 5 After due consideration of the parties' papers and supporting evidence, the 6 Court grants Digital Envoy's motion to dismiss for improper venue. The Court finds 7 no grounds for departing from the first-to-file rule. Pacesetter Sys., Inc. v. Medtronic, 8 Inc., 678 F. 2d 93, 94-95 (9th Cir. 1982). Plaintiff's action is DISMISSED without 9 prejudice. 10 11 12 DATED: June __, 2004 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 W02-SF:5BB\61412866.1 IT IS SO ORDERED. The Honorable Richard Seeborg Magistrate Judge, Northern District of California -2- ORDER. Case No. C 04 01497 RS

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?