Digital Envoy Inc., v. Google Inc.,

Filing 9

CONSENT to Proceed Before a US Magistrate Judge by Google Inc.,.. (Kramer, David) (Filed on 5/12/2004)

Download PDF
Digital Envoy Inc., v. Google Inc., Doc. 9 Case 5:04-cv-01497-RS Document 9 Filed 05/12/2004 Page 1 of 2 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 DAVID H. KRAMER, State Bar No. 168452 TAIT GRAVES, State Bar No. 197923 CHAN PARK, State Bar No. 218328 WILSON SONSINI GOODRICH & ROSATI Professional Corporation 650 Page Mill Road Palo Alto, CA 94304-1050 Telephone: (650) 493-9300 Facsimile: (650) 565-5100 Attorneys for Plaintiff Google Inc. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION GOOGLE INC., Plaintiff, v. DIGITAL ENVOY, INC., Defendant. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CASE NO.: C04 01497 RS CONSENT TO PROCEED BEFORE A UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE DIGITAL ENVOY, INC., Counterclaimant, v. GOOGLE, INC., Counterdefendant. CONSENT TO PROCEED BEFORE A UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE In accordance with the provisions of Title 28, U.S.C. Section 636(c), the undersigned in the above-captioned civil matter hereby voluntarily consents to have a United States Magistrate Judge conduct any and all further proceedings in the case, including trial, and order the entry of a CONSENT TO PROCEED BEFORE A UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE CASE NO. C04 01497 RS C:\NrPortbl\PALIB1\DAG\2439259_1.DOC Dockets.Justia.com Case 5:04-cv-01497-RS Document 9 Filed 05/12/2004 Page 2 of 2 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 final judgment. Appeal from the judgment shall be taken directly to the United Stated Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. Dated: May 12, 2004 /s/ David H. Kramer David H. Kramer Counsel for Plaintiff Google Inc. CONSENT TO PROCEED BEFORE A UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE CASE NO. C04 01497 RS -2- C:\NrPortbl\PALIB1\DAG\2439259_1.DOC

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?