Borjas v. McGrath

Filing 94

ORDER DISMISSING DEFENDANT SRIKUREJA re 91 Notice of Voluntary Dismissal. Srikureja terminated. Signed by Judge James Ware on 11/1/2010. (ecg, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/1/2010)

Borjas v. McGrath

Doc. 94

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11
ANDRADA & ASSOCIATES
PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION

J. RANDALL ANDRADA (SBN 70000) [e-mail] LAURA E. SEIDL (SBN 269891) [e-mail] ANDRADA & ASSOCIATES PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION 180 Grand Avenue, Suite 225 Oakland, California 94612 Tel.: [phone] Fax: [phone] Attorneys for Defendant RANDY SID, M.D.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE JOSEPH LANE DURSMA, Plaintiff, v. RANDY SID, M.D., et al. Defendants. Case No.: 5:10-cv-01038-JW [PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO EXTEND THE DEADLINE TO FILE DISPOSITIVE MOTION

12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

Action Filed: March 11, 2010

Defendant Randy Sid, M.D. submitted his Motion to Extend Deadline to File Motion for Summary Judgment or Other Dispositive Motion, his Notice of Motion, and the Declaration of Laura E. Seidl in Support Thereof to the Court. The Court, having read and considered the motion and related papers, and all other matters presented to the Court, and good cause appearing therefore, hereby GRANTS the motion and makes the following an Order of the Court: IT IS ORDERED that Defendant shall file a motion for summary judgment or other dispositive motion no later than November 23, 2010. The motion shall be supported by adequate factual documentation and, if applicable, shall conform in all respects to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 56. All papers filed with the Court shall be promptly served on Plaintiff.

1
{00069313.DOC/}DOC 0883

[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING MOT. TO EXTEND DEADLINE TO FILE DISPOSITIVE MOTION

Dursma v. Sid, et al. 5:10-cv-01038-JW Dockets.Justia.com

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11
ANDRADA & ASSOCIATES
PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff's opposition to the dispositive motion shall be filed with the Court and served on Defendant no later than sixty (60) days after the date on which Defendant's motion is filed. Plaintiff is referred to the Court's Order of Service filed May 27, 2010, at Docket No. 6, regarding summary judgment. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Defendant's reply brief shall be filed no later than thirty (30) days after the date Plaintiff's opposition is filed. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the motion shall be deemed submitted as of the date the reply brief is due. No hearing will be held on the motion unless the Court so orders at a later date. IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated:
November 1, 2010

12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

___________________________________ HONORABLE JAMES WARE United States District Court Judge

2
{00069313.DOC/}DOC 0883

[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING MOT. TO EXTEND DEADLINE TO FILE DISPOSITIVE MOTION

Dursma v. Sid, et al. 5:10-cv-01038-JW