Advanced Microtherm, Inc. v. Norman Wright Mechanical Equipment Corporation et al

Filing 1799

FINAL PRETRIALCONFERENCE ORDER - JURY TRIAL. Signed by Judge James Ware on August 24, 2010. (jwlc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/24/2010)

Download PDF
Advanced Microtherm, Inc. v. Norman Wright Mechanical Equipment Corporation et al Doc. 1799 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 United United States District Court For the Northern District of California 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 (2) On August 24, 2010, the Court conducted a Final Pretrial Conference. Counsel for the respective parties were present. In light of the discussion at the conference, the Court orders as follows: (1) On August 25, 2010, at least one representative from each party shall appear for a meeting with Plaintiffs' graphics expert to design charts which summarize the chronology of the alleged claims with respect various construction projects at issue in this case. Defendants may also bring their respective graphics consultants if they so desire. On or before August 27, 2010, Plaintiffs shall submit a final chart of the projects, separated by pre-bid, bid, and actual contracts as described above. On or before August 24, 2010 at 5 p.m., Plaintiffs shall disclose to Defendants a proposed supplemental report of Dr. Degnan's damages calculations. Plaintiffs shall also bring a copy of that report and lodge it with the Court at the August 25, 2010 v. Norman Wright Mech. Equip. Corp., et al., Defendants. / Advanced Microtherm, Inc., et al., Plaintiffs, IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION NO. C 04-02266 JW FINAL PRETRIAL CONFERENCE ORDER - JURY TRIAL Dockets.Justia.com 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 United States District Court For the Northern District of California 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 (5) (4) (3) Conference. Dr. Degnan's supplemental report shall not include any damages models or claims expressly excluded by the Court's previous Orders. Defendants shall file any objections to Dr. Degnan's supplemental report on or before August 27, 2010. Every trial exhibit, including Federal Rule of Evidence 1006 summaries, must be bates numbered and appear on the parties' respective trial exhibit list. At this time, the Court permits Defendant FWS to submit its 41 volumes of trial exhibits. However, the Court reserves any decisions on admissibility of those exhibits for trial. On or before August 27, 2010, the parties shall file a Joint Exhibit List consistent with this Order. As stated on the record, the Court orders that the projects listed on Dr. Degnan's original report (Exs. 8.1, 8.2), with the addition of UCSF Parnassus, will serve as the universe of projects for the trial. Whether any projects listed would be outside the scope of the case or claims that have been dismissed will be excluded based on appropriate Motions. On or before August 27, 2010, Plaintiffs shall submit a complete list of all construction projects as identified in Dr. Degnan's report. This list must contain a matrix that: (1) is organized chronologically; (2) provides each project with a unique number or other such identifier (such as "P1"); and (3) is divided into two categories, namely, "bid" and "did not bid." Moreover, the list cannot include any projects that have already been deemed irrelevant by prior orders from the Court (such as, for example, projects that fall outside the relevant geographic market). If Defendants have any objections to the chart, the parties are ordered to meet and confer on August 30, 2010 to resolve any dispute. If such attempts fail, Defendants must file any remaining objections with the Court no later than August 31, 2010. On or before August 27, 2010, the parties shall file a Revised Joint Pretrial Statement listing all claims and theories remaining in the case, as well as all affirmative 2 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 United States District Court For the Northern District of California 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 (10) (9) (8) (7) (6) defenses. The Revised Joint Statement shall not include any claims, theories or defenses that have been dismissed by the Court's prior Orders. Witnesses who have not been previously disclosed or deposed may not testify unless the witnesses are called for impeachment purposes. With respect to jury selection, on or before August 27, 2010, the parties shall file their respective proposed voir dire. In addition to the Jury Selection procedure described below, as discussed on the record, the Court will seat 6 jurors and have 4 serve as alternate jurors. As stipulated by the parties, all remaining jurors will deliberate. In addition, during voir dire, Plaintiffs will have 5 peremptory challenges total. Defendants shall each have 5 peremptory challenges, or 10 challenges total. See Fed. R. Civ. Proc. 47; 28 U.S.C. 1870. At the Conference, the parties disputed the Court's prior allocation of trial time. The record does not reflect any official ruling on this issue. Accordingly, based on the 64 sessions allotted, totaling 192 hours, the Court now orders the division of time between the parties as follows: (a) Since Plaintiffs have the burden of proof, Plaintiffs shall have a total of 72 hours; (b) (c) Defendant NSW is allotted 66 hours; Defendant FWS is allotted 54 hours, based on Defendant FWS's representation that they were not involved with all projects at issue. (See Docket Item No. 1601.) The parties may use any evidence in their Opening Statement if there are no objections to such evidence. The parties shall adhere to the following trial schedule: 3 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 United States District Court For the Northern District of California 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Jury Selection Session 1 Sessions 2-64 NO SESSION Argue & Submit Jury Deliberations TRIAL SCHEDULE September 7, 2010 at 9 a.m. September 7, 2010, 1 p.m. - 4 p.m. September 8 - November 3, 2010, 9 a.m. - 12 p.m.; 1 p.m. - 4 p.m. September 17, 2010 November 4, 2010 at 9 a.m. November 4, 2010 - November 12, 2010, if necessary Jury Selection 1. The entire panel will be sworn. The Court will inform the panel of the nature and duration of the case and ask any panel member to identify himself or herself if, due to the nature or duration of the case or any physical or personal problem, service would impose an extreme hardship. The Court will examine panel members claiming hardship and issue appropriate excuses. 2. The Clerk will call the names of all prospective jurors. Fourteen jurors will be seated in the jury box, and the others will be seated in the courtroom in the order in which their names are called. 3. The Court will conduct voir dire of the prospective jurors, including any Court-approved questions which have been previously submitted by counsel. 4. After the Court has completed voir dire, counsel shall ask for permission to approach the bench to inform the Court if counsel wish to challenge a particular juror or jurors for cause. If counsel wish to challenge for cause, the Court will determine a procedure for hearing the challenge. If parties do not indicate a desire to make legal challenges, the jury panel is deemed passed for cause, and the parties will be allowed to exercise any peremptory challenges. 5. Parties are required to responsively indicate any peremptory challenges. In multiple party cases, counsel are directed to elect and designate one of their number as "lead" counsel for the purpose of exercising joint challenges. The first 6 prospective jurors remaining after exercise of challenges shall be seated as jurors. 4 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 United States District Court For the Northern District of California 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 6. Before the remaining panel is excused, the Court will ask counsel if there is any legal cause why the panel should not be sworn as the jury for the case. If a party should indicate a desire to state legal cause, the Court will determine a time and procedure for ruling on those objections. Any objections not stated are deemed waived. Exhibits 7. On the day before the first day of trial, each party shall lodge with Chambers an exhibit binder for the Court. 8. Unless otherwise ordered, all exhibits shall be in a format compatible with either the video or digital evidence presentation system utilized by the Court for display after it is received into evidence. 9. The parties are encouraged to stipulate to the admission into evidence of all exhibits. If the parties stipulate to admissibility, the parties shall indicate, "I am going to show you Exhibit __, which is in evidence by stipulation." The exhibit may be shown to the witness and the trier of fact without being formally offered into evidence. 10. The proffering party shall retain custody of all exhibits, schedules, summaries, diagrams or charts to be used at the trial. Trial Procedure 11. In opening statements and in arguments to the jury, counsel shall not express personal knowledge or opinion concerning any matter in issue; and shall not suggest to the jury directly or indirectly, that it may or should request transcripts or the reading of any testimony by the reporter. 12. Counsel must question witnesses from the podium, using the microphone. Without requesting permission, counsel may approach witnesses for any proper purposes. 13. Address all remarks to the Court, not to opposing counsel. 14. Refer to all persons, including witnesses, other counsel and the parties by their surnames and not by their first or given names. 15. No demonstrative exhibits, charts, diagrams or enlargements shall be placed within sight of the jury unless previously disclosed to opposing counsel. 5 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 United States District Court For the Northern District of California 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 16. In examining a witness, counsel shall not repeat or echo the answer given by the witness. 17. Counsel must stand when making an objection. Arguments on points of law or evidentiary matters shall be made out of the presence of the jury. Thus, when objections or responses to objections are made, only the legal basis of the objections and responses may be stated. 18. Offers of, or requests for, a stipulation should be made privately, not within the hearing of the jury. 19. Conferences at the bench or sidebar are not favored by the Court. Counsel are responsible for bringing any matters which require hearing out of the presence of the jury to the attention of the Court during a time when the jury is not in session. Any sidebar conferences which are allowed will be off the record. If any counsel wishes to place matters on the record, he or she may so request, and the Court will make a responsive order. 20. Counsel have full responsibility to arrange for the appearance of witnesses during the presentation of their case so as to eliminate delay caused by waiting for witnesses who have been placed on call by counsel. 21. Unless an agreement to the contrary is entered into by opposing counsel, all nonparty or nonexpert witnesses will be excluded from the courtroom when not testifying. When a witness has completed his or her testimony, the witness is excused unless counsel indicates that he or she wishes the witness to remain subject to being recalled. Any witness who has been excused from further testimony may remain as a spectator. It will be the responsibility of counsel to make an announcement at the time the witness steps down that he or she should remain in the environs of the Court for a reasonable time to permit such counsel an opportunity to secure and serve a subpoena upon the witness and assume responsibility for his or her per diem and other expenses as provided by governing rule or statute. 22. Counsel shall admonish all persons at counsel table that gestures, facial expressions, audible comments, or the like, as manifestations of approval or disapproval during the testimony of witnesses, or at any other time, are prohibited. 6 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 United States District Court For the Northern District of California 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 23. Counsel should never, in the presence of the jury, ask the Court reporter to mark or flag a witness's answer to a particular question. Instead, make a note of the time and subject matter of the testimony you want marked, and inform the reporter unobtrusively at the next recess. This is to avoid the use of "marking" as a device for attracting the jury's attention to certain testimony. 24. Witness examination shall consist of direct examination, cross-examination and re-direct examination. No recross-examination will be allowed without prior approval of the Court specifically indicating the area for recross-examination. When there are multiple defense counsel, they are directed to confer and designate to the Court the sequence in which they wish to be recognized during trial for purposes of presenting opening statements and conducting crossexamination of witnesses. If one counsel conducts the direct examination of a witness, that same counsel must make objections when the witness is cross-examined. Counsel who will conduct the cross-examination should object while the witness is on direct. 25. From and after the moment the case is called for trial, any objection, motion or other application for relief made by any defense counsel, orally or in writing, shall be deemed to be adopted and joined in by every other defendant, without announcement by counsel to that effect, and the rulings of the Court shall be deemed applicable to each defendant unless otherwise stated at the time the ruling is made. Accordingly, it shall be regarded as unnecessary and improper for counsel to rise to "join in" an objection or motion. Rather, counsel should rise to be heard only for the purpose of expressly opting out of an objection or motion if that is his or her position. 26. Counsel are directed to deliver to opposing counsel at the end of each trial day (if not earlier) a list of witnesses counsel anticipates calling the next trial day. 27. Counsel calling a non-client witness to testify should have no further discussions with that witness concerning the case or any aspect of his or her testimony after the witness has been tendered for cross-examination and until such time as the witness has been tendered back for redirect examination. At all other times, within the bounds of governing ethics and the law, counsel may engage in discussions with witnesses during trial. 7 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 United States District Court For the Northern District of California 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 28. Counsel are directed to schedule any matters to be heard out of the presence of the jury at a time other than that set for the presentation of evidence. Any time taken away from presentation of evidence to the trier of fact due to, for example, lengthy legal motions made during the time allocated to the presentation of evidence, or delays in the commencement of proceedings due to circumstances within the control of counsel, will be deducted from the time allocated for the presentation of evidence. Upon timely application based upon good cause, the Court may relieve a party of its stipulation to the agreed schedule. 29. It is the practice of the Court periodically to inform counsel of the Court's record of how much time each side has remaining for the presentation of evidence based upon the stipulated trial schedule. 30. In an effort to heighten juror comprehension and to sharpen the issues in dispute, after each witness has been excused, counsel may request permission to address the jury for purposes of commenting on the significance of the evidence. Commentary shall be limited to 5 minutes for each party. Commentary shall be opened by the side calling the witness (unless waived) and closed by the side cross-examining the witness. No rebuttal to commentary shall be allowed. Commentary must conform to the rules of evidence with respect to closing argument. Counsel are cautioned to avoid any appearance of stating principles of law which apply to the case or expressing any personal opinion concerning the credibility of witnesses. Time taken for commentary shall be deducted from the time allocated to each side for the presentation of evidence. Instructing the Jury 31. The Court pre-instructs the jury as to preliminary matters immediately before opening statements, and finally instructs before arguments of counsel. Written instructions are provided to the jury upon retiring for deliberation. Jury Deliberations 32. Counsel and litigants are not required to remain in the courtroom during jury deliberations; however, it is counsel's responsibility to keep the clerk fully informed as to counsel's whereabouts at all times, including the noon hour. Counsel are expected to return to the courtroom 8 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 United States District Court For the Northern District of California 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 within five minutes after being notified to do so. Failure to be available will be deemed waiver of the right to be present. 33. The jury will be permitted to take a noon recess or other rest breaks without the necessity of reconvening, and to retire for the evening and resume their deliberations the next morning without reconvening. Daily Trial Transcript 34. Any counsel desiring daily or expedited transcripts during trial should make immediate arrangements with the court reporter and should inform the Court and other counsel of such intentions. Dated: August 23, 2010 JAMES WARE United States District Judge 9 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 United States District Court For the Northern District of California 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 THIS IS TO CERTIFY THAT COPIES OF THIS ORDER HAVE BEEN DELIVERED TO: Annabel Hayoung Chang achang@flynn-williams.com Bruce Harry Winkelman bwinkelman@Craig-Winkelman.com Cassiana Aaronson ca@mcinerney-dillon.com David Irwin Kornbluh dkornbluh@millermorton.com Dennis P. Fitzsimons dfitzsimons@bjg.com Eric Charles McAllister ecm@millermorton.com Gary Alexander Sloboda gary.sloboda@sdma.com George Castro Leal gleal@chandoilaw.com George Fred Salamy george.salamy@mccurdylawyers.com Glendon W. Miskel glen@miskel.com Howard Ira Miller hmiller@bztm.com Jeffrey Gordon Nevin jnevin@ellislawgrp.com Jill Battilega Rowe jrowe@cwclaw.com John Francis McLean jackmclean1@comcast.net John J. Bartko jbartko@bztm.com John Morwick Ross jross@cwclaw.com John T. Williams jwilliams@hww-law.com Joseph M. Alioto jmalioto@aliotolaw.com Joseph Michelangelo Alioto jaliotojr@aliotolaw.com Julie Dawn Wood jwood@omm.com Kenneth Lawrence Mahaffey kmahaffey@pecklaw.com LeCarie Shalece Whitfield LSW@mcinerney-dillon.com Lisa Dritsas Wright lwright@alr-law.com Maria Giardina maria.giardina@sdma.com Matthew A. Fischer matthew.fischer@sdma.com Maureen Ellen McTague maureen_sandoval@gensler.com Merrit Jones mjones@cwclaw.com Michael David Abraham mabraham@bztm.com Michael Frederick Tubach mtubach@omm.com Robert H. Bunzel rbunzel@bztm.com Russell F. Brasso brasso@foremanandbrasso.com Sloan C. Bailey sbailey@flynn-williams.com Stephen D. Kaus skaus@cwclaw.com Steven Ellis Conigliaro sconigliaro@omm.com Theresa Driscoll Moore Tmoore@aliotolaw.com Thomas Charles Tagliarini tagliarinilaw@aol.com Thomas H R Denver tdenver@mediationmasters.com William Hugh McInerney wjr@mcinerney-dillon.com William James McGahan wjmcgahan@mcinerney-dillon.com Zane D. Negrych zanenegrych@gmail.com Dated: August 24, 2010 Richard W. Wieking, Clerk By: /s/ JW Chambers Elizabeth Garcia Courtroom Deputy 10

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?