Charnofsky et al v. Wyeth et al
Filing
42
CONDITIONAL REMAND ORDER - ORDER REOPENING CASE. Signed by Judge The Executive Committee on 5/31/2012. (Attachments: # 1 Pretrial Order, # 2 Docket Sheet, # 3 MDL Master Docket Sheet)(tsh, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/31/2012)
Case MDL No. 1507 Document 1290 Filed 05/23/12 Page 1 of 4
UNITED STATES JUDICIAL PANEL
on
MULTIDISTRICT LITIGATION
IN RE: PREMPRO PRODUCTS LIABILITY
LITIGATION
MDL No. 1507
(SEE ATTACHED SCHEDULE)
By: /s/ Tenesha Jones D.C. on
May 23, 2012
CONDITIONAL REMAND ORDER
The transferee court in this litigation has advised the Panel that coordinated or consolidated pretrial
proceedings in the action(s) on this conditional remand order have been completed and that remand
to the transferor court(s), as provided in 28 U.S.C. §1407(a), is appropriate.
IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that the action(s) on this conditional remand order be remanded to
its/their respective transferor court(s).
IT IS ALSO ORDERED that, pursuant to Rule 10.2 of the Rules of Procedure of the United States
Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation, the transmittal of this order to the transferee clerk for filing
shall be stayed 7 days from the date of this order. If any party files a notice of opposition with the
Clerk of the Panel within this 7-day period, the stay will be continued until further order of the Panel.
This order does not become effective until it is filed in the office of the Clerk for the United States
District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas.
FOR THE PANEL:
Jeffery N. Lüthi
Clerk of the Panel
Case MDL No. 1507 Document 1290 Filed 05/23/12 Page 2 of 4
IN RE: PREMPRO PRODUCTS LIABILITY
LITIGATION
SCHEDULE FOR CRO
TRANSFEREE
DIST DIV. C.A.NO.
TRANSFEROR
DIST DIV. C.A.NO.
CASE CAPTION
Case MDL No. 1507 Document 1290 Filed 05/23/12 Page 3 of 4
Vacated 5/16/12
Case MDL No. 1507 Document 1290 Filed 05/23/12 Page 4 of 4
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?