Google Inc. v. Compression Labs Inc et al

Filing 8

Attachment 1
MOTION to Dismiss or, in the Alternative, to Transfer, and Memorandum in Support filed by Compression Labs Inc, Forgent Networks Inc, General Instruments Corporation. Motion Hearing set for 11/19/2004 10:00 AM. (Attachments: # 1 Proposed Order # 2 Affidavit Declaration of L. Steven Leshin# 3 Exhibit Exhibit A# 4 Exhibit Exhibit B# 5 Exhibit Exhibit C# 6 Exhibit Exhibit D)(Wessels, Shelley) (Filed on 10/12/2004)

Download PDF
Google Inc. v. Compression Labs Inc et al Doc. 8 Att. 1 Case 5:04-cv-03934-JF Document 8-2 Filed 10/12/2004 Page 1 of 2 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Shelley K. Wessels (#152394) WESSELS LAW GROUP 861 Bette Ave. Cupertino, CA 95014 Tel.: 408.255.7964 Stephen G. Rudisill (of counsel) Gary E. Hood (of counsel) Russell J. Genet (of counsel) Justin D. Swindells (of counsel) Brian N. Anderson (of counsel) JENKENS & GILCHRIST 225 West Washington St., Suite 2600 Chicago, Illinois 60606 Tel. 312-425-3900 Fax 312-425-3909 Counsel for Defendants Compression Labs, Inc., Forgent Networks, Inc. and General Instrument Corp. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION GOOGLE, INC., a Delaware Corporation, Plaintiff, v. COMPRESSION LABS, INC., a Delaware corporation; FORGENT NETWORKS, INC., a Delaware corporation; and GENERAL INSTRUMENTS [sic] CORPORATION, a Delaware corporation, Defendants. Case No. C04 03934 CW [PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS' MOTION TO DISMISS Date: November 19, 2004 Time: 10:00 a.m. Court: Honorable Claudia Wilken Defendants in this case have moved to dismiss or, in the alternative, to transfer. Having fully considered all pleadings, materials, and oral argument provided in support of and in opposition to the motion, and the relevant facts and law, the Court GRANTS the motion for the following separate, independent reasons. 1 [PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS' MOTION TO DISMISS Dockets.Justia.com Case 5:04-cv-03934-JF Document 8-2 Filed 10/12/2004 Page 2 of 2 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Date: 1. Subject matter jurisdiction does not exist as to defendants Forgent Networks, Inc. and General Instrument Corporation; the Court dismisses the action against them with prejudice under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(1). 2. Personal jurisdiction does not exist over any defendant, and the Court dismisses the action with prejudice on that basis under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(2). 3. The Court dismisses the dismissed with prejudice in favor of first- filed cases in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas. SO ORDERED. ______ ____________________________ Honorable Claudia Wilken 2 [PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS' MOTION TO DISMISS

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?