Padgett et al v. City of Monte Sereno et al

Filing 1040

BRIEFING ORDER. On October 11, 2013, the parties appeared before Judge Edward J. Davila for a case management conference. Based on the parties' Case Management Statements and the discussions held at the conference, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that briefing on the remanded issues of attorneys fees and costsshall be as follows: Motions due by 12/13/2013. Oppositions due by 1/17/2014. Replies due by 2/7/2014. The motions will be deemed submitted for decision uponconclusion of the briefing ordered herein unless the court orders otherwise. Please see Order for specifics. Signed by Judge Edward J. Davila on 10/22/2013. (ecg, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/22/2013)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

8

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

9

SAN JOSE DIVISION
CASE NO. 5:04-cv-03946 EJD

JOSEPH PADGETT, et. al.,

11

BRIEFING ORDER
Plaintiff(s),

For the Northern District of California

United States District Court

10

12
13

v.
CITY OF MONTE SERENO, et. al.,

14
Defendant(s).
15

/

16

On October 11, 2013, the parties appeared before Judge Edward J. Davila for a case

17

management conference. Based on the parties’ Case Management Statements and the discussions

18

held at the conference,

19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that briefing on the remanded issues of attorneys fees and costs
shall be as follows:
MOTION

DEADLINE TO FILE AND SERVE

(1) Plaintiff Joseph Padgett’s motion in support of his
request for attorneys fees and costs for the services of
the law firm of McManis & Faulkner;
(2) Trial counsels’ (M. Jeffrey Kallis and Steven M.
Berki) motion in support of their request for attorneys
fees and costs; and

December 13, 2013

(3) Defendants’ motion in support of their request for
costs.
Any opposition to (1), (2) or (3)

January 17, 2014

28
1
CASE NO. 5:04-cv-03946 EJD
BRIEFING ORDER

1

Any reply to (1), (2) or (3)

February 7, 2014

2
3

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that all motions must include copies of billing statements,

4

redacted as appropriate, to account for any particular fees or costs request, such that the court does

5

not need to reference any document other than the motion or supporting declaration in order to

6

properly examine and rule on the request. This means that supporting statements must be provided

7

with the motion even if they were provided before or appear within another document already filed.

8

Failure to provide supporting billing statements may constitute sufficient grounds to deny a request,

9

either in whole or in part.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the motions will be deemed submitted for decision upon

11
For the Northern District of California

United States District Court

10

conclusion of the briefing ordered herein unless the court orders otherwise.

12

IT IS SO ORDERED.

13
14

Dated: October 22, 2013
EDWARD J. DAVILA
United States District Judge

15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
CASE NO. 5:04-cv-03946 EJD
BRIEFING ORDER

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

PADGETT ET AL,

Case Number: CV04-03946 EJD

Plaintiff,

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

v.
CITY OF MONTE SERENO ET AL,
Defendant.

/

I, the undersigned, hereby certify that I am an employee in the Office of the Clerk, U.S. District
Court, Northern District of California.
That on October 22, 2013, I SERVED a true and correct copy(ies) of the attached, by placing
said copy(ies) in a postage paid envelope addressed to the person(s) hereinafter listed, by
depositing said envelope in the U.S. Mail, or by placing said copy(ies) into an inter-office
delivery receptacle located in the Clerk's office.
Joseph Padgett
25840 SE 41st Street
Issaquah, WA 98029-5771
Dated: October 22, 2013
Richard W. Wieking, Clerk
/s/ By: Elizabeth Garcia, Deputy Clerk