Padgett et al v. City of Monte Sereno et al

Filing 996

DEFAULT JUDGMENT AGAINST DEFENDANT RICE. Signed by Judge James Ware on June 9, 2010. (jwlc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/9/2010)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Darla Padgett, et al., v. Plaintiffs, IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION NO. C 04-03946 JW DEFAULT JUDGMENT AGAINST DEFENDANT LISA RICE United United States District Court 11 For the Northern District of California 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Brian Loventhal, et al., Defendants. / Pursuant to the Court's June 9, 2010 Order Granting Plaintiffs' Motion for Default Judgment, judgment is entered in favor of Plaintiffs Darla Padgett and Joseph Padgett against Defendant Lisa Rice for Plaintiffs' claims of intentional and negligent infliction of emotional distress. Judgment is entered against Defendant Lisa Rice for $20,000 in compensatory damages to Plaintiff Darla Padgett and $20,000 in compensatory damages to Plaintiff Joseph Padgett. Judgment is entered in favor of Defendant Lisa Rice against Plaintiffs Dara Padgett and Joseph Padgett on Plaintiffs' 42 U.S.C. § 1983 claim. Plaintiffs shall take nothing for their Section 1983 claim against Defendant Rice. The Clerk shall close this file. Dated: June 9, 2010 JAMES WARE United States District Judge 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 THIS IS TO CERTIFY THAT COPIES OF THIS ORDER HAVE BEEN DELIVERED TO: Andrew Vinson Stearns astearns@boglawyers.com Joseph C. Howard jhoward@hrmrlaw.com M. Jeffery Kallis M_J_Kallis@Kallislaw.org Thomas H R Denver tdenver@mediationmasters.com Lisa M. Rice 2276 Alexian Drive San Jose, CA 95116 Dated: June 9, 2010 Richard W. Wieking, Clerk By: /s/ JW Chambers Elizabeth Garcia Courtroom Deputy United States District Court 11 For the Northern District of California 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?