IN RE:INFINEON TECHNOLOGIES AG SECURITIES LITIGATION

Filing 370

ORDER APPROVING PLAN OF ALLOCATION OF SETTLEMENT PROCEEDS. Signed by Judge James Ware on 11/2/11. (sis, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/2/2011)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
10
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
11
SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION
12
In re INFINEON TECHNOLOGIES AG
13 SECURITIES LITIGATION
14
15

) Master File No. C-04-4156-JW
)
CLASS ACTION
)

This Document Relates To:
ALL ACTIONS.

16

) [PROPOSED] ORDER APPROVING PLAN
) OF ALLOCATION OF SETTLEMENT
) PROCEEDS
DATE:
October 17, 2011
TIME:
9:00 a.m.
CTRM: The Honorable James Ware

17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25

26
27
28

646763_I

1

THIS MATTER having come before the Court on Plaintiff’s application for approval of the

2 Plan of Allocation of the net settlement proceeds in the above-captioned action; the Court having
3 considered all papers filed and proceedings had herein and otherwise being fully informed in the
4 premises;

5

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED that:

6

For purposes of this Order, the terms used herein shall have the same meanings as set

7 forth in the Stipulation of Settlement dated June 20, 2011 (the "Stipulation")
8

2.

Pursuant to and in full compliance with Rule 23 of the Federal Rules of Civil

9 Procedure, this Court hereby finds and concludes that due and adequate notice was directed to all
10 Persons and entities who are Settlement Class Members advising them of the Plan of Allocation and
11 of their right to object thereto, and a full and fair opportunity was accorded to all Persons and entities
12 who are Settlement Class Members to be heard with respect to the Plan of Allocation.
13

3.

The Court hereby finds and concludes that the formula for the calculation of the

14 claims of Authorized Claimants which is set forth in the Notice of Pendency and Proposed
15 Settlement of Class Action (the "Notice") sent to Settlement Class Members, provides a fair and
16 reasonable basis upon which to allocate the proceeds of the Net Settlement Fund established by the
17 Stipulation among Settlement Class Members, with due consideration having been given to
18 administrative convenience and necessity.
19

4.

The Court hereby finds and concludes that the Plan of Allocation set forth in the

20 Notice is in all respects fair and reasonable and the Court hereby approves the Plan of Allocation.
21

IT IS SO ORDERED.

22 DATED: November 2, 2011
23

THE HONORABLE JAMES WARE
UNITED STATES DISTRICT CHIEF JUDGE

24

25
26
27
28
646763_I

[PROPOSED] ORDER APPROVING PLAN OF ALLOCATION OF SETTLEMENT PROCEEDS
-C-04-4l56-JW

-1-

Submitted by:
ROBBINS GELLER RUDMAN
& DOWD LLP
JOHN K. GRANT
CHRISTOPHER M. WOOD
Post Montgomery Center
One Montgomery Street, Suite 1800
San Francisco, CA 94104
Telephone: [phone]
415/288-4534 (fax)
ROBBINS GELLER RUDMAN
& DOWD LLP
JOY ANN BULL

10

s/ Joy Ann Bull
JOY ANN BULL

11

655 West Broadway, Suite 1900
12 San Diego, CA 92101-3301
Telephone: [phone]
13 619/231-7423 (fax)
14
MURRAY FRANK LLP
15 BRIAN P. MURRAY
275 Madison Avenue, Suite 801
16 New York, NY 10016
Telephone: [phone]
17 212/682-1892 (fax)
18 Co-Lead Counsel for Plaintiffs
19 VANOVERBEKE MICHAUD
& TIMMONY, P.C.
20 MICHAEL J. VANOVERBEKE
THOMAS C. MICHAUD
21 79 Alfred Street
Detroit, MI 48201
22 Telephone: [phone]
313/578-1201 (fax)
23
TILP PLLC
24 MARC SCHIEFER
140 Broadway
25 New York, NY 10005
Telephone: [phone]
26 212/818-0477 (fax)
27 Additional Counsel for Plaintiffs
28
6467631

[PROPOSED] ORDER APPROVING PLAN OF ALLOCATION OF SETTLEMENT PROCEEDS

-C-04-4156-JW

-2-