Giuseppe Campanella, et al v. Lynette Longoria, et al

Filing 282

ORDER REGARDING PLAINTIFFS' OBJECTIONS TO DEFENDANTS' DEPOSITION EXCERPTS. Signed by Judge Richard Seeborg on 1/12/09. (rssec, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/12/2009)

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 GIUSEPPE CAMPANELLA, et al., v. Plaintiffs, NO. C 04-4906 RS ORDER REGARDING PLAINTIFFS' OBJECTIONS TO DEFENDANTS' DEPOSITION EXCERPTS IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION *E-FILED 1/12/09*

United States District Court

11
For the Northern District of California

12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 A.

LYNETTE LONGORIA, et al., Defendants. /

Plaintiffs' Objections to Deposition Excerpts of Giuseppe Campanella The following rulings address plaintiffs' objections to defendants' designation of deposition

excerpts of Giuseppe Campanella. Where the objection is overruled thereby permitting the use of the excerpt, all colloquy between counsel within the relevant entry is ordered to be redacted before presentation to the jury. The order of the Court is as follows: (1) 253:19-257:1 Objection overruled as to the testimony, and sustained to the extent defendants seek to introduce the appraisal referred to in the excerpt. (2) 301:23-307:20 (3) 307:21-310:22 (4) 310:22-311:20 (5) 417:4-426:2 Objection overruled. Objection sustained. Objection overruled. The excerpt may be used but the parties are instructed to substitute language such as "when I gave testimony" in lieu of all references to 1

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 B. (6) 426:16-427:18 (7) 429:10-431:18 (8) 432:21-433:15 (9) 433:16-433:19 (10) 433:20-435:3 (11) 437:23-438:2

"trial" or "criminal trial." Objection sustained. Objection sustained. Objection sustained. No objection invoked. Objection sustained. Objection sustained.

Plaintiffs' Objections to Deposition Excerpts of Lynette Campanella The following rulings address plaintiffs' objections to defendants' designation of deposition

excerpts of Lynette Campanella. Where the objection is overruled thereby permitting the use of the excerpt, all colloquy between counsel within the relevant entry is ordered to be vacated before presentation to the jury. The order of the Court is as follows: (1) 34:21-42:24 (2) 42:25-43:14 (3) 161:1-17 (4) 427:4-8 Objection sustained. Objection overruled. Objection sustained. Objection overruled but if excerpt is used, 427:8-15 shall also be presented. (5) 428:1-5 (6) 447:16-454:10 (7) 454:11-466:4 (8) 466:5-475:23 (9) 475:24-481:11 (10) 488:5-24 (11) 582:21-583:24 (12) 607:12-608:1 (13) 612:2-613:2 (14) 622:21-23 (15) 629:23-630:4 Objection sustained. Objection sustained. Objection overruled. Objection sustained. Cumulative. Objection overruled. Objection sustained. Objection sustained. Objection sustained. Objection sustained. Objection sustained. Objection overruled. 2

United States District Court

11
For the Northern District of California

12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: January 12, 2009

RICHARD SEEBORG United States Magistrate Judge

United States District Court

11
For the Northern District of California

12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
ORDER REGARDING PLAINTIFFS' OBJECTIONS TO DEFENDANTS' DEPOSITION EXCERPTS C 04-4906 RS

3