In re: UTSTARCOM, INC. SECURITIES LITIGATION

Filing 306

STIPULATION AND ORDER REGARDING CONTINUING FURTHER CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE from 4/27/09 to 5/4/09; Joint Case Management Statement due from 4/17/09 to 4/24/09 re 304 Stipulation. Joint Case Management Statement due 4/24/2009. Initial Case Management Conference set for 5/4/2009 10:00 AM in Courtroom 8, 4th Floor, San Jose before Hon. James Ware. Signed by Judge James Ware on 4/13/2009. (ecg, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/13/2009)

Download PDF
1 COUGHLIN STOIA GELLER RUDMAN & ROBBINS LLP 2 CHRISTOPHER P. SEEFER (201197) D SHIRLEY H. HUANG (206854) RDERE 3 100 Pine Street, Suite 2600 IS SO O FIED IT DI San Francisco, CA 94111 AS MO 4 Telephone: 415/288-4545 415/288-4534 (fax) es Ware 5 cseefer@csgrr.com udge Jam J shuang@csgrr.com 6 ER Lead Counsel for Plaintiffs C N 7 OF D UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT I S T R I C T 8 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 SAN JOSE DIVISION 10 In re UTSTARCOM, INC. SECURITIES ) Master File No. C-04-4908-JW(PVT) 11 LITIGATION ) ) CLASS ACTION 12 ) ) STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER This Document Relates To: 13 ) REGARDING CONTINUING FURTHER ) CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE ALL ACTIONS. 14 ) UNIT ED S S DISTRICT TE C TA 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 A LI FO R NIA RT U O NO RT H 1 WHEREAS, on March 27, 2009, the Court set a deadline for a Joint Case Management 2 Statement to be filed by April 17, 2009 and a Further Case Management Conference ("CMC") for 3 April 27, 2009, at 10:00 a.m.; 4 WHEREAS, plaintiffs' counsel have a scheduling conflict with the April 27, 2009 date and 5 respectfully request the Court to continue the CMC; and 6 7 WHEREAS, the parties met and conferred regarding the scheduling of the CMC; NOW THEREFORE, pursuant to the parties' stipulation and subject to the Court's approval, 8 the deadline for filing the Joint Case Management Statement is April 24, 2009, and the CMC is 9 continued to Monday, May 4, 2009, at 10:00 a.m. 10 IT IS SO STIPULATED. COUGHLIN STOIA GELLER RUDMAN & ROBBINS LLP CHRISTOPHER P. SEEFER SHIRLEY H. HUANG 11 DATED: April 7, 2009 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 DATED: April 7, 2009 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 s/ Shirley H. Huang SHIRLEY H. HUANG 100 Pine Street, Suite 2600 San Francisco, CA 94111 Telephone: 415/288-4545 415/288-4534 (fax) Lead Counsel for Plaintiffs WILSON SONSINI GOODRICH & ROSATI TERRY T. JOHNSON BORIS FELDMAN BAHRAM SEYEDIN-NOOR CHERYL W. FOUNG BRYAN J. KETROSER L. DAVID NEFOUSE s/ Bahram Seyedin-Noor BAHRAM SEYEDIN-NOOR STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER REGARDING CONTINUING FURTHER CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE - C-04-4908-JW(PVT) -1- 1 2 3 4 5 6 DATED: April 7, 2009 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 650 Page Mill Road Palo Alto, California 94304-1050 Telephone: 650/493-9300 650/493-6811 (fax) Attorneys for Defendants UTStarcom, Inc., Hong Liang Lu, Michael J. Sophie, Thomas J. Toy, and Ying Wu SULLIVAN & CROMWELL LLP JASON DE BRETTEVILLE s/ Jason De Bretteville JASON DE BRETTEVILLE 1870 Embarcadero Road Palo Alto, CA 94303 Telephone: 650/461-5600 650/461-5700 (fax) Attorneys for Defendants SOFTBANK America, Inc., SOFTBANK Holdings, Inc., and SOFTBANK Corporation I, Shirley H. Huang, am the ECF User whose ID and password are being used to file this STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER REGARDING CONTINUING FURTHER CASE 16 MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE . In compliance with General Order 45, X.B., I hereby attest that Bahram Seyedin-Noor and Jason De Bretteville have concurred in this filing. 17 * * * 18 ORDER 19 IT IS SO ORDERED AS MODIFIED. The parties shall file their Joint Statement on or IT IS SO ORDERED. before April 24, 2009. 20 DATED: April 13, 2009 _________________________ ____________________________________ THE HONORABLE JAMES WARE 21 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER REGARDING CONTINUING FURTHER CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE - C-04-4908-JW(PVT) S:\CasesSD\UTStarcom 04\STP00058705.doc -2-

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?