"The Apple iPod iTunes Anti-Trust Litigation"

Filing 268

STIPULATION AND ORDER GRANTING Briefing Schedule re 266 Stipulation. Signed by Judge James Ware on 10/15/2009. (ecg, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/16/2009)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 13 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 14 SAN JOSE DIVISION 15 THE APPLE IPOD ITUNES ANTI-TRUST 16 LITIGATION 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 This Document Relates To: ALL ACTIONS. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Lead Case No. C-05-00037-JW(RS) CLASS ACTION [PROPOSED] ORDER REGARDING STIPULATION REGARDING BRIEFING SCHEDULE UNIT ED S S DISTRICT TE C TA ER N D IS T IC T R OF A C LI FO mes Wa Judge Ja re R NIA O OR IT IS S DERED RT U O NO RT H 1 Good cause appearing, therefore, and pursuant to the stipulation of the parties, IT IS 2 HEREBY ORDERED that the following pretrial briefing schedule is adopted: 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 [PROPOSED] ORDER RE STIPULATION REGARDING BRIEFING SCHEDULE - C-05-00037S:\CasesSD\Apple Tying\ORD00062277.doc Direct Plaintiffs' Opposition to Apple's Motion for Decertification of Rule 23(b)(3) Class Apple's Reply Brief in Support of Motion for Decertification Rule 23(b)(3) Class Direct Plaintiffs' Reply Brief in Support of Motion to Modify the Injunctive Relief Class Definition to Include iTMS Purchasers Apple's Reply Brief in Support of Motion for Reconsideration of the Rule 23(b)(2) Class Indirect Plaintiff's Reply Brief in Support of Supplemental Memorandum in Support of Motion for Class Certification of Rule 23(b)(2) Class IT IS SO ORDERED. Due on or before October 19, 2009 Due on or before November 9, 2009 Due on or before November 9, 2009 Due on or before November 9, 2009 Due on or before November 9, 2009 October 15, 2009 DATED: ___________________ THE HONORABLE JAMES WARE UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE JW(RS) -1-

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?