"The Apple iPod iTunes Anti-Trust Litigation"

Filing 326

Declaration of Michael Scott in Support of 325 MOTION to Dismiss Or, Alternatively, For Summary Judgment filed byApple Inc.. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit Exhibits 1-5, # 2 Exhibit Exhibits 6-7)(Related document(s) 325 ) (Scott, Michael) (Filed on 2/22/2010)

Download PDF
"The Apple iPod iTunes Anti-Trust Litigation" Doc. 326 Case5:05-cv-00037-JW Document326 Filed02/22/10 Page1 of 3 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Robert A. Mittelstaedt #60359 ramittelstaedt@jonesday.com Craig E. Stewart #129530 cestewart@jonesday.com David C. Kiernan #215335 dkiernan@jonesday.com Michael T. Scott #255282 michaelscott@jonesday.com JONES DAY 555 California Street, 26th Floor San Francisco, CA 94104 Telephone: (415) 626-3939 Facsimile: (415) 875-5700 Attorneys for Defendant APPLE INC. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION THE APPLE iPOD iTUNES ANTI-TRUST LITIGATION. Case No. C 05-00037 JW (HRL) C 06-04457 JW (HRL) DECLARATION OF MICHAEL SCOTT IN SUPPORT OF APPLE'S MOTION TO DISMISS OR, ALTERNATIVELY, FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT I, Michael Scott, declare as follows: 1. I am an associate in the law firm of Jones Day, located at 555 California Street, 26th Floor, San Francisco, CA 94104. I am a member in good standing of the State Bar of California (#255282) and represent Apple Inc. in this case. I make this declaration in support of Apple's Motion to Dismiss Or, Alternatively, for Summary Judgment. I have personal knowledge of the facts set forth herein and, if called as a witness, I could and would testify competently thereto. -1- Scott Decl. ISO Apple's Motion to Dismiss C 05 00037 JW (HRL), C 06-04457 JW (HRL) Dockets.Justia.com Case5:05-cv-00037-JW Document326 Filed02/22/10 Page2 of 3 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2. Attached hereto as Exhibit 1 is a true and correct copy of Ina Fried & Daniel Terdiman, Microsoft's Zune to Rival Apple's iPod, CNET News, July 21, 2006, printed from http://news.cnet.com/Microsofts-Zune-to-rival-Apples-iPod/2100-1041_3-6097196.html on February 17, 2010. 3. Attached hereto as Exhibit 2 is a true and correct copy of excerpts of the transcript of the deposition of Gary L. French, Ph.D., taken in Somers v. Apple (Case No. C 07-6507) on April 3, 2009. 4. Attached hereto as Exhibit 3 is a true and correct copy of Thomas O. Barnett, Assistant Attorney General, Antitrust Division, U.S. Department of Justice, Interoperability Between Antitrust and Intellectual Property, Presentation to the George Mason University School of Law Symposium, Managing Antitrust Issues in a Global Marketplace, September 13, 2006, printed from http://www.justice.gov/atr/public/speeches/218316.htm on February 17, 2010. 5. Attached hereto as Exhibit 4 is a true and correct copy of excerpts of RealNetworks, Inc.'s Form 10-Q report to the Securities and Exchange Commission for the quarter ended June 30, 2005, printed from http://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1046327/000095012405004817/v11277e10vq.htm on February 17, 2010. 6. Attached hereto as Exhibit 5 is a true and correct copy of A.B. 671, 1989-1990 Leg., Reg. Sess. (Cal. 1989). 7. Attached hereto as Exhibit 6 is a true and correct copy of S.B. 1814, 2001-2002 Leg., Reg. Sess. (Cal. 2002). 8. Attached hereto as Exhibit 7 is a true and correct copy of S.B. 1274, 2005-2006 Leg., Reg. Sess. (Cal. 2006). -2- Scott Decl. ISO Apple's Motion to Dismiss C 05 00037 JW (HRL), C 06-04457 JW (HRL) Case5:05-cv-00037-JW Document326 Filed02/22/10 Page3 of 3 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the United States and the State of California that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed this 22nd day of February, 2010 in San Francisco, California. /s/ Michael Scott Michael Scott SFI-630339v1 -3- Scott Decl. ISO Apple's Motion to Dismiss C 05 00037 JW (HRL), C 06-04457 JW (HRL)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?