"The Apple iPod iTunes Anti-Trust Litigation"

Filing 687

ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 7-11 Regarding Seven Motions Renoticed by Plaintiffs filed by Apple Inc. (Attachments: # 1 Proposed Order)(Mittelstaedt, Robert) (Filed on 10/14/2011) Modified on 10/17/2011 (far, COURT STAFF).

1
2
3
4
5
6
7

Robert A. Mittelstaedt #60359
[e-mail]
Craig E. Stewart #129530
[e-mail]
David C. Kiernan #215335
[e-mail]
JONES DAY
555 California Street, 26th Floor
San Francisco, CA 94104
Telephone:
[phone]
Facsimile:
[phone]
Attorneys for Defendant
APPLE INC.

8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION
11
12
13
14
15

THE APPLE iPOD iTUNES ANTI-TRUST
LITIGATION
___________________________________
This Document Relates To:

Lead Case No. C 05-00037 JW
[CLASS ACTION]
(PROPOSED) ORDER REGARDING
PLAINTIFFS’ REQUEST TO RENOTICE CLASS CERTIFICATION
AND OTHER MOTIONS

16
ALL ACTIONS

17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27

The Court, having considered Plaintiffs’ Re-Notice of Pending Motions Pursuant to
court’s September 27, 2011 Order (Doc. 686) and Apple’s Administrative Motion filed
October 14, 2011, and for good cause shown,
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED as follows:
1. By October 24, 2011, Plaintiffs shall file a revised motion to certify the class that they are
presently seeking to certify. By November 14, 2011, Apple shall file its opposition papers
and its previously-ordered supplemental expert declaration on class certification. By
November 21, 2011, Plaintiffs shall file any reply. The motion shall be set for an
evidentiary hearing and argument for December __, 2011.

28
SFI-714226v1

C 05-00037 JW
(PROPOSED) ORDER

1

2. [Or: On November 21, 2011, the parties shall file supplemental briefs not to exceed __

2

pages addressing how the new expert reports ordered by the Court affect the class

3

certification motion.]

4

3. Instead of re-noticing the six other motions identified in Plaintiffs’ Re-Notice (Doc. 686),

5

by October 20, 2011, Plaintiffs shall file a brief not to exceed five pages, showing with

6

specificity why those motions are not moot and why they should be re-noticed. By

7

October 27, 2011, Apple may file a responsive brief not to exceed five pages.

8
9
Dated: October 14, 2011

Honorable Chief Judge Ware

10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
SFI-714226v1

-2-

C 05-00037 JW
(PROPOSED) ORDER