"The Apple iPod iTunes Anti-Trust Litigation"
Filing
689
RESPONSE (re 687 ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 7-11 Regarding Seven Motions Renoticed by Plaintiffs ) Plaintiffs' Opposition to Apple's Administrative Motion Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 7-11 Regarding Seven Motions Renoticed by Plaintiffs filed byMelanie Tucker. (Attachments: # 1 Proposed Order)(Bernay, Alexandra) (Filed on 10/20/2011)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
13
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
14
SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION
15
THE APPLE IPOD ITUNES ANTI-TRUST
16 LITIGATION
17
18
This Document Relates To:
ALL ACTIONS.
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
659692_1
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
Lead Case No. C-05-00037-JW
CLASS ACTION
[PROPOSED] ORDER REGARDING
PLAINTIFFS’ OPPOSITION TO APPLE’S
ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION PURSUANT
TO CIVIL LOCAL RULE 7-11
REGARDING SEVEN MOTIONS
RENOTICED BY PLAINTIFFS
1
The Court, having considered Plaintiffs’ Re-notice of Pending Motions Pursuant to Court’s
2 September 27, 2011 Order, filed October 13, 2011 (Dkt. No. 686), Apple’s Administrative Motion
3 Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 7-11 Regarding Seven Motions Renoticed by Plaintiffs, filed October
4 14, 2011 (Dkt. No. 687) and Plaintiffs’ Opposition to Apple’s Administrative Motion Pursuant to
5 Civil Local Rule 7-11 Regarding Seven Motions Renoticed By Plaintiffs, filed October 20, 2011,
6 and for good cause shown,
7
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED as follows:
8
1.
Apple’s Proposed Order Regarding Plaintiffs’ Request to Re-notice Class
9 Certification and Other Motions is DENIED.
10
2.
The Court shall consider the re-noticed motions related to class certification on
11 November 28, 2011 as re-noticed by the Plaintiffs in Docket No. 686 or as soon thereafter as the
12 motions may be heard.
13 DATED: ______________________
14
_____________________________________________
THE HONORABLE JAMES WARE
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CHIEF JUDGE
15
Submitted by:
16
17
18
19
20
21
ROBBINS GELLER RUDMAN
& DOWD LLP
JOHN J. STOIA, JR.
BONNY E. SWEENEY
THOMAS R. MERRICK
ALEXANDRA S. BERNAY
CARMEN A. MEDICI
655 West Broadway, Suite 1900
San Diego, CA 92101
Telephone: 619/231-1058
619/231-7423 (fax)
22
THE KATRIEL LAW FIRM
23 ROY A. KATRIEL
1101 30th Street, N.W., Suite 500
24 Washington, DC 20007
Telephone: 202/625-4342
25 202/330-5593 (fax)
26 Co-Lead Counsel for Plaintiffs
27
28
659692_1
[PROPOSED] ORDER RE PLTFS’ OPPO TO APPLE’S ADMIN MOTION PURSUANT TO CIVIL
LOCAL RULE 7-11 RE SEVEN MOTIONS RENOTICED BY PLAINTIFFS - C-05-00037-JW
-1-
1
2
3
4
5
6
BONNETT, FAIRBOURN, FRIEDMAN
& BALINT, P.C.
ANDREW S. FRIEDMAN
FRANCIS J. BALINT, JR.
ELAINE A. RYAN
TODD D. CARPENTER
2901 N. Central Avenue, Suite 1000
Phoenix, AZ 85012
Telephone: 602/274-1100
602/274-1199 (fax)
7 BRAUN LAW GROUP, P.C.
MICHAEL D. BRAUN
8 10680 West Pico Blvd., Suite 280
Los Angeles, CA 90064
9 Telephone: 310/836-6000
310/836-6010 (fax)
10
MURRAY FRANK LLP
11 BRIAN P. MURRAY
275 Madison Avenue, Suite 801
12 New York, NY 10016
Telephone: 212/682-1818
13 212/682-1892 (fax)
14 GLANCY BINKOW & GOLDBERG LLP
MICHAEL GOLDBERG
15 1801 Avenue of the Stars, Suite 311
Los Angeles, CA 90067
16 Telephone: 310/201-9150
310/201-9160 (fax)
17
Additional Counsel for Plaintiffs
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
659692_1
[PROPOSED] ORDER RE PLTFS’ OPPO TO APPLE’S ADMIN MOTION PURSUANT TO CIVIL
LOCAL RULE 7-11 RE SEVEN MOTIONS RENOTICED BY PLAINTIFFS - C-05-00037-JW
-2-
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?