"The Apple iPod iTunes Anti-Trust Litigation"

Filing 75

STIPULATION re 74 MOTION to Related Case Administrative Motion to Consider Whether Cases Should Be Related -- Civil L.R. 3-12 by Melanie Tucker. (Attachments: # 1 Proposed Order)(Stoia, John) (Filed on 8/22/2006)

Download PDF
"The Apple iPod iTunes Anti-Trust Litigation" Doc. 75 Att. 1 Case 5:05-cv-00037-JW Document 75-2 Filed 08/22/2006 Page 1 of 3 1 LERACH COUGHLIN STOIA GELLER RUDMAN & ROBBINS LLP 2 JOHN J. STOIA, JR. (141757)P johns@lerachlaw.com 3 BONNY E. SWEENEY (176174) bonnys@lerachlaw.com 4 CHRISTOPHER M. BURKE (214799) chrisb@lerachlaw.com 5 655 West Broadway, Suite 1900 San Diego, CA 92101 6 Telephone: 619/231-1058 619/231-7423 (fax) 7 BONNETT, FAIRBOURN, FRIEDMAN 8 & BALINT, P.C. ANDREW S. FRIEDMAN 9 afriedman@bffb.com ELAINE A. RYAN 10 eryan@bffb.com TODD D. CARPENTER 11 tcarpenter@bffb.com 2901 North Central Avenue, Suite 1000 12 Phoenix, AZ 85012 Telephone: 602/274-1100 13 602/274-1199 (fax) 14 Attorneys for Plaintiff Melanie Tucker 15 16 17 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) No. C 05-00037 JW [PROPOSED] RELATED CASE ORDER ­ CIVIL L.R. 3-12 18 THOMAS WILLIAM SLATTERY, individually, and on behalf of all others 19 similarly situated, 20 21 vs. Plaintiff, 22 APPLE COMPUTER, INC., 23 24 25 26 27 28 [Caption continued on following page.] Defendant. Dockets.Justia.com Case 5:05-cv-00037-JW Document 75-2 Filed 08/22/2006 Page 2 of 3 1 MELANIE TUCKER, On Behalf of Herself and All Others Similarly Situated, 2 Plaintiff, 3 vs. 4 APPLE COMPUTER, INC., a California 5 corporation, 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Defendant. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) No. C-06-04457-HRL Case 5:05-cv-00037-JW Document 75-2 Filed 08/22/2006 Page 3 of 3 1 A Motion for Administrative Relief to Consider Whether Cases Should be Related has been 2 filed, asserting that the above-captioned cases are related pursuant to Civil L.R. 3-12(b). The time 3 for filing a statement to support or oppose the Motion has expired. On the basis of the material 4 submitted to the Court, as the Judge assigned to the earliest filed case, I find that the cases: 5 6 [ ] ARE NOT RELATED [ ] ARE RELATED as defined by Civil L.R. 3-12(b). Pursuant to Civil L.R. 3-12(e), the 7 Clerk of the Court is ordered to reassign the later actions to the undersigned. Counsel are instructed 8 that all future filings are to bear the initials JW immediately after the case number. All matters 9 presently scheduled for hearing in the reassigned cases are vacated and must be renoticed for hearing 10 before the undersigned. 11 12 13 IT IS SO ORDERED. THE HONORABLE JAMES WARE UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE * * ORDER * 14 DATED: _________________________ 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?