Rambus Inc., v. Hynix Semiconductor Inc. et al

Filing 2147

ORDER requesting Rambus to file a reply brief to its motion in limine 1044 (C-05-02298). Signed by Judge Ronald M. Whyte on 9/8/2008. (rmwlc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/8/2008)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 v. HYNIX SEMICONDUCTOR INC., HYNIX SEMICONDUCTOR AMERICA INC., HYNIX SEMICONDUCTOR MANUFACTURING AMERICA INC., SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD., SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS AMERICA, INC., SAMSUNG SEMICONDUCTOR, INC., SAMSUNG AUSTIN SEMICONDUCTOR, L.P., NANYA TECHNOLOGY CORPORATION, NANYA TECHNOLOGY CORPORATION U.S.A., Defendants. RAMBUS INC., Plaintiff, v. SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD., SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS AMERICA, INC., SAMSUNG SEMICONDUCTOR, INC., SAMSUNG AUSTIN SEMICONDUCTOR, L.P., Defendants. No. C-05-02298 RMW [Re Docket No. 1044] RAMBUS INC., Plaintiff, No. C-05-00334 RMW ORDER REQUESTING RAMBUS TO FILE A REPLY BRIEF TO ITS MOTION IN LIMINE TO BAR USE OF PRIVILEGED MATERIALS [Re Docket No. 2087] E-filed: IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION 9/8/2008 United States District Court 11 For the Northern District of California 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 ORDER REQUESTING RAMBUS TO FILE A REPLY BRIEF TO ITS MOTION IN LIMINE TO BAR USE OF PRIVILEGED MATERIALS C-05-00334 RMW; C-05-02298 RMW TSF 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 In the course of its preparation for the September 11, 2008 pretrial conference, the court notes that Samsung has raised substantial new issues not previously addressed in this court's handling of Rambus's claims of attorney-client privilege. Rambus may file a reply brief addressing Samsung's opposition, particularly Samsung's arguments regarding voluntary waiver (section I of Samsung's opposition). Any reply brief should not exceed 15 pages and should be filed no later than Tuesday, September 9 at 5:00 pm. DATED: 9/8/2008 RONALD M. WHYTE United States District Judge United States District Court 11 For the Northern District of California 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 ORDER REQUESTING RAMBUS TO FILE A REPLY BRIEF TO ITS MOTION IN LIMINE TO BAR USE OF PRIVILEGED MATERIALS C-05-00334 RMW; C-05-02298 RMW TSF 2 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Notice of this document has been electronically sent to: counsel in C-05-00334 and C-05-02298. Counsel for Rambus Inc., all actions Burton Alexander Gross Carolyn Hoecker Luedtke Catherine Rajwani Craig N. Tolliver David C. Yang Douglas A. Cawley Erin C. Dougherty Gregory P. Stone Jennifer Lynn Polse Keith Rhoderic Dhu Hamilton, II Kelly Max Klaus Miriam Kim Peter A. Detre Pierre J. Hubert Rosemarie Theresa Ring Scott L Cole Scott W. Hejny Sean Eskovitz Steven McCall Perry Thomas N Tarnay William Hans Baumgartner, Jr Burton.Gross@mto.com carolyn.luedtke@mto.com crajwani@sidley.com ctolliver@mckoolsmith.com david.yang@mto.com dcawley@mckoolsmith.com erin.dougherty@mto.com gregory.stone@mto.com jen.polse@mto.com keith.hamilton@mto.com kelly.klaus@mto.com Miriam.Kim@mto.com detrepa@mto.com phubert@mckoolsmith.com rose.ring@mto.com scole@mckoolsmith.com shejny@sidley.com sean.eskovitz@mto.com steven.perry@mto.com ttarnay@sidley.com wbaumgartner@sidley.com Counsel for Hynix entities, C-00-20905 and C-05-00334 Allen Ruby Belinda Martinez Vega Daniel J. Furniss Geoffrey Hurndall Yost Jordan Trent Jones Joseph A. Greco Kenneth Lee Nissly Kenneth Ryan O'Rourke Patrick Lynch Susan Gregory VanKeulen Theodore G. Brown, III Tomomi Katherine Harkey ruby@allenrubylaw.com bvega@omm.com djfurniss@townsend.com gyost@thelenreid.com jtjones@townsend.com jagreco@townsend.com kennissly@thelenreid.com korourke@omm.com plynch@omm.com svankeulen@thelenreid.com tgbrown@townsend.com tharkey@thelen.com United States District Court 11 For the Northern District of California 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Counsel for Micron entities, C-06-00244 Aaron Bennett Craig David J. Ruderman Harold Avrum Barza Jared Bobrow John D Beynon Leeron Kalay Linda Jane Brewer Rachael Lynn Ballard McCracken Robert Jason Becher Yonaton M Rosenzweig aaroncraig@quinnemanuel.com davidruderman@quinnemanuel.com halbarza@quinnemanuel.com jared.bobrow@weil.com john.beynon@weil.com leeron.kalay@weil.com lindabrewer@quinnemanuel.com rachaelmccracken@quinnemanuel.c om robertbecher@quinnemanuel.com yonirosenzweig@quinnemanuel.co m ORDER REQUESTING RAMBUS TO FILE A REPLY BRIEF TO ITS MOTION IN LIMINE TO BAR USE OF PRIVILEGED MATERIALS C-05-00334 RMW; C-05-02298 RMW TSF 3 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Counsel for Nanya entities, C-05-00334 Chester Wren-Ming Day Craig R. Kaufman Glenn Michael Levy Jan Ellen Ellard Jason Sheffield Angell Kaiwen Tseng Mark Shean Robert E. Freitas Vickie L. Feeman cday@orrick.com ckaufman@orrick.co m glevy@orrick.com jellard@orrick.com jangell@orrick.com ktseng@orrick.com mshean@orrick.com rfreitas@orrick.com vfeeman@orrick.com Counsel for Samsung entities, C-05-00334 and C-0502298 Ana Elena Kadala Claire Elise Goldstein David J. Healey Edward Robert Reines Matthew D. Powers anita.kadala@weil.com claire.goldstein@weil.com david.healey@weil.com Edward.Reines@weil.com matthew.powers@weil.com United States District Court 11 For the Northern District of California 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 ORDER REQUESTING RAMBUS TO FILE A REPLY BRIEF TO ITS MOTION IN LIMINE TO BAR USE OF PRIVILEGED MATERIALS C-05-00334 RMW; C-05-02298 RMW TSF 4 Counsel for intervenor, Texas Instruments, Inc., C-05-00334 Kelli A. Crouch kcrouch@jonesday.com Counsel for intervenor, United States Department of Justice, C-00-20905 Eugene S. Litvinoff May Lee Heye Nathanael M. Cousins Niall Edmund Lynch eugene.litvinoff@usdoj.gov may.heye@usdoj.gov nat.cousins@usdoj.gov Niall.Lynch@USDOJ.GOV Counsel for intervenor, Elpida Memory, Inc., C-00-20905 and C-05-00334 Eric R. Lamison John J. Feldhaus elamison@kirkland.com jfeldhaus@foley.com Counsel are responsible for distributing copies of this document to co-counsel that have not registered for e-filing under the court's CM/ECF program in each action. Dated: 9/8/2008 TSF Chambers of Judge Whyte

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?