Rambus Inc., v. Hynix Semiconductor Inc. et al

Filing 2534

STIPULATION AND ORDER regarding page limits on specified Daubert briefing. Signed by Judge Ronald M. Whyte on 11/13/2008. (rmwlc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/13/2008)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 (Parties and counsel listed on signature page) E-filed: November 14, 2008 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, SAN JOSE DIVISION RAMBUS INC., Plaintiff, vs. HYNIX SEMICONDUCTOR INC., et al., Defendants. CASE NO.: C 05-00334 RMW STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER RE PAGE LIMIT FOR RAMBUS'S CONSOLIDATED OPPOSITION TO MANUFACTURERS' DAMAGESRELATED DAUBERT AND SUMMARY JUDGMENT MOTIONS RAMBUS INC., Plaintiff, vs. SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD., et al., Defendants. CASE NO.: C 05-02298 RMW STIP. AND PROPOSED ORDER RE: PAGE LIMIT; CASE NOS. 05-334 RMW; 05-2298 RMW; 06-244 RMW 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 -2STIP. AND PROPOSED ORDER RE: PAGE LIMIT; CASE NOS. 05-334 RMW; 05-2298 RMW; 06-244 RMW RAMBUS INC., Plaintiff, vs. MICRON TECHNOLOGY INC., et al., Defendants. CASE NO.: C 06-00244 RMW 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 WHEREAS, the following Daubert and summary judgment motions, among others, were filed on October 24 and October 27, 2008: (1) Hynix's Daubert Motion to Exclude Portions of Expert Report and Testimony of Rambus's Damages Expert David J. Teece (Daubert No. 6); (2) Micron's and Samsung's Daubert Motion to Preclude David J. Teece From Offering Testimony Regarding an "Infringer's Royalty," Royalty Rate Surveys and Two Unquantified "Adjustments" That Allegedly "Offset One Another" (Daubert No. 8); (3) Micron's and Samsung's Joint Daubert Motion and Motions in Limine Regarding Certain Damages Issues (Daubert No. 9); (4) Nanya Technology Corporation's and Nanya Technology Corporation USA's Daubert Motion to Exclude Certain Testimony of Dr. Teece re: Hypothetical Negotiation Date (Daubert No. 10); (5) Nanya Technology Corporation's and Nanya Technology Corporation USA's Motion re Royalty Base Issues (Daubert No. 11); (6) Micron's and Samsung's Motion for Summary Judgment Regarding Certain Damages Issues and Related Daubert Motions to Preclude David J. Teece From Offering Testimony on Such Issues (MSJ No. 8); (7) Nanya Technology Corporation's Motion for Partial Summary Judgment of Non-Infringement (Limitation of Damages/Non-U.S. Sales) (MSJ No. 9); (8) Nanya Technology Corporation USA's Motion for Partial Summary Judgment of Non-Infringement (Limitation of Damages/Non-U.S. Sales) (MSJ No. 10); and (9) Hynix's Motion for Summary Judgment For the Prevention of Double Recovery of Damages Relating to Hynix's Sales of DDR2, DDR3, gDDR2, and GDDR3 Products (MSJ No. 11); and WHEREAS, Rambus intends to file a single consolidated opposition to the abovelisted motions (including any joinders to such motions); -1- STIP. AND PROPOSED ORDER RE: PAGE LIMIT; CASE NOS. 05-334 RMW; 05-2298 RMW; 06-244 RMW 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 reply briefs. NOW, THEREFORE, the parties stipulate and agree as follows: 1. 2. Rambus's consolidated opposition brief shall be no longer than 75 pages. This stipulation does not affect the Manufacturers' right to file individual Dated: November 12, 2008 ROLLIN A. RANSOM (Bar No. 196126) SIDLEY AUSTIN LLP By: /s/ . ROLLIN A. RANSOM Attorneys for Plaintiff RAMBUS INC. Dated: November 12, 2008 SVEN RAZ (Bar No. 222262) WEIL, GOTSHAL & MANGES LLP By: /s/ SVEN RAZ . Attorneys for Defendants MICRON TECHNOLOGY, INC., and MICRON SEMICONDUCTOR PRODUCTS, INC. Dated: November 12, 2008 ROBERT S. BEREZIN (admitted pro hac vice) WEIL, GOTSHAL & MANGES LLP By: /s/ . ROBERT S. BEREZIN Attorneys for Defendants SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD., SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS AMERICA, INC., SAMSUNG SEMICONDUCTOR, INC., and SAMSUNG AUSTIN SEMICONDUCTOR, L.P. -2- STIP. AND PROPOSED ORDER RE: PAGE LIMIT; CASE NOS. 05-334 RMW; 05-2298 RMW; 06-244 RMW 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Dated: November 12, 2008 THEODORE G. BROWN III (Bar No. 114672) TOWNSEND and TOWNSEND and CREW LLP By: /s/ . THEODORE G. BROWN III Attorneys for Defendants HYNIX SEMICONDUCTOR INC., HYNIX SEMICONDUCTOR AMERICA INC., and HYNIX SEMICONDUCTOR MANUFACTURING AMERICA INC. Dated: November 12, 2008 ROBERT E. FREITAS (Bar No. 80948) ORRICK, HERRINGTON & SUTCLIFFE LLP By: /s/ . ROBERT E. FREITAS Attorneys for Defendants NANYA TECHNOLOGY CORPORATION, and NANYA TECHNOLOGY CORPORATION USA -3- STIP. AND PROPOSED ORDER RE: PAGE LIMIT; CASE NOS. 05-334 RMW; 05-2298 RMW; 06-244 RMW 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 13 Dated: November __, 2008 ORDER Pursuant to stipulation, it is so ordered. _____________________________ The Honorable Ronald M. Whyte United States District Judge -4- STIP. AND PROPOSED ORDER RE: PAGE LIMIT; CASE NOS. 05-334 RMW; 05-2298 RMW; 06-244 RMW 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 ATTESTATION Filer's Attestation: Pursuant to General Order No. 45, X(B), I attest under penalty of perjury that concurrence in the filing of this e-filed document has been obtained from counsel for the Manufacturers. Dated: November 12, 2008 By: /s/ ROLLIN A. RANSOM . -5- STIP. AND PROPOSED ORDER RE: PAGE LIMIT; CASE NOS. 05-334 RMW; 05-2298 RMW; 06-244 RMW

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?