Rambus Inc., v. Hynix Semiconductor Inc. et al

Filing 2971

Sealing ORDER 2560 . Signed by Judge Ronald M. Whyte on 12/23/08. (jg, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/23/2008)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 [] Order Granting MAR to Seal Docs *E-FILED - 12/23/08* UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION Case No. C 05-00334 RMW [] ORDER GRANTING MISCELLANEOUS ADMINISTRATIVE REQUEST TO SEAL (1) PORTIONS OF SAMSUNG'S OPPOSITION TO RAMBUS'S DAUBERT MOTION NO. 3 AND MOTION IN LIMINE REGARDING W. CHRISTOPHER BAKEWELL AND (2) EXHIBITS 1, 2, AND 6 TO THE DECLARATION OF ROBERT S. BEREZIN IN SUPPORT OF SAMSUNG'S OPPOSITION TO RAMBUS'S DAUBERT MOTION NO. 3 AND MOTION IN LIMINE REGARDING W. CHRISTOPHER BAKEWELL Case No. C 05-02298 RMW RAMBUS, INC., Plaintiff, v. HYNIX SEMICONDUCTOR INC., et al., Defendants. RAMBUS, INC., Plaintiff, v. SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD., et al., Defendants. CASE NO. C 05 00334 RMW CASE NO. C 05 02298 RMW 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 As set forth in Samsung's Miscellaneous Administrative Request To Seal (1) Portions of Samsung's Opposition to Rambus's Daubert Motion No. 3 and Motion In Limine Regarding W. Christopher Bakewell and (2) Exhibits 1, 2, and 6 to the Declaration of Robert S. Berezin In Support of Samsung's Opposition to Rambus's Daubert Motion No. 3 and Motion In Limine Regarding W. Christopher Bakewell (hereinafter "Samsung's Miscellaneous Administrative Request"), Samsung lodged with the Court the following: 1. Samsung's Opposition to Rambus's Daubert Motion No. 3 and Motion In Limine Regarding W. Christopher Bakewell; 2. Exhibit 1 to the Declaration of Robert S. Berezin In Support of Samsung's Opposition to Rambus's Daubert Motion No. 3 and Motion In Limine Regarding W. Christopher Bakewell; 3. Exhibit 2 to the Declaration of Robert S. Berezin In Support of Samsung's Opposition to Rambus's Daubert Motion No. 3 and Motion In Limine Regarding W. Christopher Bakewell; 4. Exhibit 6 to the Declaration of Robert S. Berezin In Support of Samsung's Opposition to Rambus's Daubert Motion No. 3 and Motion In Limine Regarding W. Christopher Bakewell. Having considered Samsung's Miscellaneous Administrative Request, and for good cause appearing therefore, Samsung's Opposition to Rambus's Daubert Motion No. 3 and Motion In Limine Regarding W. Christopher Bakewell, and Exhibits 1, 2, and 6 to the Declaration of Robert S. Berezin In Support of Samsung's Opposition to Rambus's Daubert Motion No. 3 and Motion In Limine Regarding W. Christopher Bakewell is to be filed under seal. IT IS SO ORDERED. DATED: 12/23 ______________, 2008 By: Honorable Ronald M. Whyte [] Order Granting MAR to Seal Docs CASE NO. C 05 00334 RMW CASE NO. C 05 02298 RMW

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?