Rambus Inc., v. Hynix Semiconductor Inc. et al

Filing 2971

Sealing ORDER 2560 . Signed by Judge Ronald M. Whyte on 12/23/08. (jg, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/23/2008)

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
[] Order Granting MAR to Seal Docs

*E-FILED - 12/23/08*

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA ­ SAN JOSE DIVISION Case No. C 05-00334 RMW [] ORDER GRANTING MISCELLANEOUS ADMINISTRATIVE REQUEST TO SEAL (1) PORTIONS OF SAMSUNG'S OPPOSITION TO RAMBUS'S DAUBERT MOTION NO. 3 AND MOTION IN LIMINE REGARDING W. CHRISTOPHER BAKEWELL AND (2) EXHIBITS 1, 2, AND 6 TO THE DECLARATION OF ROBERT S. BEREZIN IN SUPPORT OF SAMSUNG'S OPPOSITION TO RAMBUS'S DAUBERT MOTION NO. 3 AND MOTION IN LIMINE REGARDING W. CHRISTOPHER BAKEWELL Case No. C 05-02298 RMW

RAMBUS, INC., Plaintiff, v. HYNIX SEMICONDUCTOR INC., et al., Defendants.

RAMBUS, INC., Plaintiff, v. SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD., et al., Defendants.

CASE NO. C 05 00334 RMW CASE NO. C 05 02298 RMW

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

As set forth in Samsung's Miscellaneous Administrative Request To Seal (1) Portions of Samsung's Opposition to Rambus's Daubert Motion No. 3 and Motion In Limine Regarding W. Christopher Bakewell and (2) Exhibits 1, 2, and 6 to the Declaration of Robert S. Berezin In Support of Samsung's Opposition to Rambus's Daubert Motion No. 3 and Motion In Limine Regarding W. Christopher Bakewell (hereinafter "Samsung's Miscellaneous Administrative Request"), Samsung lodged with the Court the following: 1. Samsung's Opposition to Rambus's Daubert Motion No. 3 and Motion In Limine Regarding W. Christopher Bakewell; 2. Exhibit 1 to the Declaration of Robert S. Berezin In Support of Samsung's Opposition to Rambus's Daubert Motion No. 3 and Motion In Limine Regarding W. Christopher Bakewell; 3. Exhibit 2 to the Declaration of Robert S. Berezin In Support of Samsung's Opposition to Rambus's Daubert Motion No. 3 and Motion In Limine Regarding W. Christopher Bakewell; 4. Exhibit 6 to the Declaration of Robert S. Berezin In Support of Samsung's Opposition to Rambus's Daubert Motion No. 3 and Motion In Limine Regarding W. Christopher Bakewell. Having considered Samsung's Miscellaneous Administrative Request, and for good cause appearing therefore, Samsung's Opposition to Rambus's Daubert Motion No. 3 and Motion In Limine Regarding W. Christopher Bakewell, and Exhibits 1, 2, and 6 to the Declaration of Robert S. Berezin In Support of Samsung's Opposition to Rambus's Daubert Motion No. 3 and Motion In Limine Regarding W. Christopher Bakewell is to be filed under seal. IT IS SO ORDERED.

DATED:

12/23 ______________, 2008

By:

Honorable Ronald M. Whyte

[] Order Granting MAR to Seal Docs

CASE NO. C 05 00334 RMW CASE NO. C 05 02298 RMW