Rambus Inc., v. Hynix Semiconductor Inc. et al

Filing 2982

Sealing ORDER 2891 . Signed by Judge Ronald M. Whyte on 12/23/08. (jg, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/23/2008)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Attorneys Listed On Signature Page *E-FILED - 12/23/08* UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA - SAN JOSE DIVISION RAMBUS INC., v. Plaintiff, Case No. C 05-00334 RMW [] ORDER GRANTING MISCELLANEOUS ADMINISTRATIVE REQUEST PURSUANT TO CIVIL LOCAL HYNIX SEMICONDUCTOR INC., RULES 7-10 AND 79-5 TO SEAL HYNIX SEMICONDUCTOR AMERICA 1. MICRON, HYNIX AND SAMSUNG'S INC., HYNIX SEMICONDUCTOR OPPOSITION TO RAMBUS'S MOTION IN MANUFACTURING LIMINE NO. 12 TO PRECLUDE THE AMERICA INC., MANUFACTURERS FROM PRESENTING CUMULATIVE TESTIMONY FROM SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD., DAMAGES EXPERTS, TO REQUIRE SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS AMERICA, SELECTION OF ONE "LEAD EXPERT" TO INC., SAMSUNG SEMICONDUCTOR, TESTIFY CONCERNING COMMON INC., SAMSUNG AUSTIN DAMAGES ISSUES, AND TO REQUIRE SEMICONDUCTOR, L.P., COORDINATED CROSS-EXAMINATION OF RAMBUS'S DAMAGES EXPERT NANYA TECHNOLOGY CORPORATION, NANYA 2. MICRON, HYNIX AND SAMSUNG'S TECHNOLOGY CORPORATION OPPOSITION TO RAMBUS'S MOTION IN U.S.A., LIMINE NO. 13 TO EXCLUDE EVIDENCE OF OR RELIANCE UPON THE INFINEON Defendants. SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT, AGREEMENTS AFFECTED BY THE INFINEON RULINGS, AND RELATED NEGOTIATIONS 3. EXHIBITS 8 AND 10 TO THE DECLARATION OF SVEN RAZ IN SUPPORT OF OPPOSITIONS TO RAMBUS'S MOTIONS IN LIMINE NOS. 4, 5, 9, 12, 13 AND 25 Hearing Date: December 19, 2008 Time: 2:00 p.m. Courtroom: 6 Honorable Ronald M. Whyte CASE NO. C 05-00334 RMW CASE NO. C 05-02298 RMW CASE NO. C 06-00244 RMW ORDER GRANTING MISCELLANEOUS ADMINISTRATIVE REQUEST TO SEAL DOCUMENTS 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 RAMBUS INC., v. Plaintiff, Case No. C 05-02298 RMW SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD., SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS AMERICA, INC., SAMSUNG SEMICONDUCTOR, INC., SAMSUNG AUSTIN SEMICONDUCTOR, L.P., Defendants. RAMBUS INC., v. Plaintiff, Case No. C 06-00244 RMW MICRON TECHNOLOGY, INC. and MICRON SEMICONDUCTOR PRODUCTS, INC., Defendants. ORDER GRANTING MISCELLANEOUS ADMINISTRATIVE REQUEST TO SEAL DOCUMENTS CASE NO. C 05-00334 RMW CASE NO. C 05-02298 RMW CASE NO. C 06-00244 RMW 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 JARED BOBROW (Bar No. 133712) Email: jared.bobrow@weil.com JOHN D. BEYNON (Bar No. 233581) Email: john.beynon@weil.com WEIL GOTSHAL & MANGES LLP 201 Redwood Shores Parkway Redwood Shores, CA 94065 Telephone: (650) 802-3034 Facsimile: (650) 802-3100 ELIZABETH STOTLAND WEISWASSER Email: elizabeth.weiswasser@weil.com DAVID LENDER Email: david.lender@weil.com WEIL, GOTSHAL & MANGES LLP New York Office 767 Fifth Avenue New York, NY 10153 Telephone: (212) 310-8000 Facsimile: (646) 842-0505 WILLIAM C. PRICE (Bar No. 108542) Email: william.price@quinnemanuel.com HAROLD A. BARZA (Bar No. 80888) Email: halbarza@quinnemanuel.com JON R. STEIGER (Bar No. 229814) Email: jonsteiger@quinnemanuel.com ROBERT J. BECHER (Bar No. 193431) Email: robertbecher@quinnemanuel.com QUINN EMANUEL URQUHART OLIVER & HEDGES, LLP 865 South Figueroa Street, 10th Floor Los Angeles, CA 90017 Telephone: (213) 443-3000 Facsimile: (213) 443-3100 Attorneys for Defendants MICRON TECHNOLOGY, INC. and MICRON SEMICONDUCTOR PRODUCTS, INC. ORDER GRANTING MISCELLANEOUS ADMINISTRATIVE REQUEST TO SEAL DOCUMENTS CASE NO. C 05-00334 RMW CASE NO. C 05-02298 RMW CASE NO. C 06-00244 RMW 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 As set forth in defendants Micron Technology, Inc.'s and Micron Semiconductor Products, Inc.'s (collectively "Micron") Miscellaneous Administrative Request Pursuant To Civil Local Rules 7-10 and 79-5 To Seal Documents, Micron lodged with the Court the following documents in connection with Micron's Opposition to Rambus's Motions in Limine Nos. 4, 5, 9, 12, 13 and 25: Confidential Version of Micron, Hynix and Samsung's Opposition To Rambus's Motion In Limine No. 12 To Preclude The Manufacturers From Presenting Cumulative Testimony From Damages Experts, To Require Selection Of One "Lead Expert" To Testify Concerning Common Damages Issues, And To Require Coordinated Cross-Examination Of Rambus's Damages Expert; Confidential Version of Micron, Hynix and Samsung's Opposition To Rambus's Motion In Limine No. 13 To Exclude Evidence Of Or Reliance Upon The Infineon Settlement Agreement, Agreements Affected By The Infineon Rulings, And Related Negotiations; Exhibit 8 To the Declaration of Sven Raz in Support of Oppositions to Rambus's Motions In Limine Nos. 4, 5, 9, 12, 13 and 25; Exhibit 10 To the Declaration of Sven Raz in Support of Oppositions to Rambus's Motions In Limine Nos. 4, 5, 9, 12, 13 and 25; Having considered Micron's Miscellaneous Administrative Request, and good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Confidential Version of Micron, Hynix and Samsung's Opposition To Rambus's Motion In Limine No. 12 To Preclude The Manufacturers From Presenting Cumulative Testimony From Damages Experts, To Require Selection Of One "Lead Expert" To Testify Concerning Common Damages Issues, And To Require Coordinated Cross-Examination Of Rambus's Damages Expert; the Confidential Version of Micron, Hynix and Samsung's Opposition To Rambus's Motion In Limine No. 13 To Exclude Evidence Of Or Reliance Upon The Infineon Settlement Agreement, Agreements Affected By The Infineon Rulings, And Related Negotiations; and Exhibits 8 and 10 to the Declaration of Sven Raz in ORDER GRANTING MISCELLANEOUS ADMINISTRATIVE REQUEST TO SEAL DOCUMENTS 1 CASE NO. C 05-00334 RMW CASE NO. C 05-02298 RMW CASE NO. C 06-00244 RMW 1 ADMINISTRATIVE REQUEST TO SEAL DOCUMENTS ORDER GRANTING MISCELLANEOUS 2 CASE NO. C 05-00334 RMW CASE NO. C 05-02298 RMW CASE NO. C 06-00244 RMW 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2/23/08

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?