Google, Inc. v. Affinity Engines, Inc.

Filing 35

STIPULATION and Proposed Order selecting Mediation by Google, Inc. Statement Regarding ADR Procedure (Kramer, David) (Filed on 5/31/2005)

Download PDF
Google, Inc. v. Affinity Engines, Inc. Doc. 35 Case 5:05-cv-00598-JW Document 35 Filed 05/31/2005 Page 1 of 2 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 JAMES A. DIBOISE, State Bar No. 83296 (jdiboise@wsgr.com) DAVID S. KRAMER, State Bar No. 168452 (dkramer@wsgr.com) COLLEEN BAL, State Bar No. 167637 (cbal@wsgr.com) WILSON SONSINI GOODRICH & ROSATI Professional Corporation 650 Page Mill Road Palo Alto, CA 94304-1050 Telephone: (650) 493-9300 Facsimile: (650) 565-5100 Attorneys for Plaintiff GOOGLE INC. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION GOOGLE INC., a Delaware corporation, Plaintiff, v. AFFINITY ENGINES, INC., a Delaware corporation, Defendant. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CASE NO.: C-05-00598 JW (HRL) STATEMENT REGARDING ADR PROCEDURE Counsel for Google, Inc. ("Google") hereby files this "Statement" regarding ADR Procedure. Counsel for Affinity Engines, Inc. ("AEI") has refused to meet and confer regarding ADR procedures pursuant to Civil L.R. 16-8 and ADR L.R. 3-5. Nonetheless, Google hereby informs the Court that it agrees to participate in the following ADR process: Court Processes: ____ Arbitration __X__ ENE __X__ Mediation -12665961_1.DOC STATEMENT REGARDING ADR PROCEDURE CASE NO.: C-05-00598 JW (HRL) Dockets.Justia.com Case 5:05-cv-00598-JW Document 35 Filed 05/31/2005 Page 2 of 2 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Private Process: _____ Private ADR Dated: May 31, 2005 WILSON SONSINI GOODRICH & ROSATI Professional Corporation By: /s/ David H. Kramer_____________________ David H. Kramer Attorneys for Plaintiff GOOGLE INC. STATEMENT REGARDING ADR PROCEDURE CASE NO.: C-05-00598 JW (HRL) -2- 2665961_1.DOC

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?