Brown v. Google, Inc. et al

Filing 22

Brown v. Google, Inc. et al

Doc. 22

Case 5:05-cv-01779-RMW

Document 22

Filed 06/02/2005

Page 1 of 2

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NOR THE RN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION

United States District Court

11 12
For the Northern District of California

ROBERT A. BROWN,

13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) ) GOOGLE, INC., et al., ) ) Defendants. ) ___________________________________ )

Case No.: C 05-1779 PVT OR D E R CONTINUING HEARING ON MO T I O N TO DISMISS; AND SETTING DE A D L IN E FOR PARTIES TO FILE EITHER A CO N S E N T TO PROCEED BEFORE A MA G I ST R A T E JUDGE, OR ELSE A DE C L IN A T I O N TO AND REQUEST FOR RE A S SI G N M E N T

On May 6, 2005, Defendants Google, Inc. and Marissa Mayer ("Defendants") filed a motion to dismiss.1 Pursuant to this court's standing order each party was thus required to file either a consent to Magistrate Judge jurisdiction, or else a request for reassignment, no later than May 20, 2005.2 To date, no party has complied. Therefore, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that, no later than June 15, 2005, all parties shall file either a Consent to Proceed Before a Magistrate Judge, or else a Declination to Proceed Before a Magistrate Judge and Request for Reassignment. Both forms are available from the clerk of the court, or from The holding of this court is limited to the facts and the particular circumstances underlying the present motion. The Standing Order for Civil Practice in Cases Assigned for All Purposes to Magistrate Judge Patricia V. Trumbull (rev. 4/25/03) requires that, within two weeks after any party files a dispositive motion, all parties who have not already done so must file either a consent to Magistrate Judge jurisdiction or else a requests for reassignment to a District Court Judge. OR D E R, page 1
Dockets.Justia.com
2 1

Case 5:05-cv-01779-RMW

Document 22

Filed 06/02/2005

Page 2 of 2

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10

the "forms" section of the court's website (www.cand.uscourts.gov). IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the hearing on Defendants' motion to dismiss is continued to 10:00 a.m. on July 12, 2005. Dated: 6/2/05 /s/ Patricia V. Trumbull PATRICIA V. TRUMBULL Unit ed States Magistrate Judge

United States District Court

11 12
For the Northern District of California

13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 OR D E R, page 2