Carrizosa et al v. Stassinos et al

Filing 303

ORDER re 296 Further Proceedings. Signed by Judge Whyte on 6/29/10. (rmwlc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/29/2010)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 United United States District Court For the Northern District of California 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Pursuant to the court's June 1, 2010 order, defendants Legal Recovery Services, Inc. ("LRS") and Alan Mecham were to inform the court by June 16, 2010 whether they intend to proceed further in this case. LRS has notified the court that it does not intend to proceed further in this case. Mecham has not advised the court whether it wishes to proceed. LRS and Mecham were also provided fifteen days to object to plaintiffs' proposal for further proceedings in this case. Neither defendant has objected. Therefore, within sixty days of this order, plaintiffs shall file a motion for summary judgment on all unresolved liability and damage issues, which the court anticipates LRS and Mecham will not oppose. If either LRS or Mecham attempt to oppose the motion, the court will review any reason IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION RICHARD L. CARRIZOSA, and MARY PEA, on behalf of themselves and others similarly situated, Plaintiffs, v. PAUL R. STASSINOS, an individual, ALAN MECHAM, an individual, LEGAL RECOVERY SERVICES, INC., a California corporation, et al., Defendants. No. C-05-02280 RMW E-FILED on 6/29/10 ORDER REGARDING FURTHER PROCEEDINGS [Re Docket No. 296] ORDER REGARDING FURTHER PROCEEDINGS--No. C-05-02280 RMW 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 United States District Court For the Northern District of California 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 that the defendant provides for not previously advising the court that he intends to defend the case and will issue an appropriate order. DATED: 6/29/10 RONALD M. WHYTE United States District Judge ORDER REGARDING FURTHER PROCEEDINGS--No. C-05-02280 RMW 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?