Advanced Internet Technologies, Inc. v. Google, Inc.

Filing 12

Advanced Internet Technologies, Inc. v. Google, Inc.

Doc. 12

Case 5:05-cv-02579-RMW

Document 12

Filed 08/22/2005

Page 1 of 2

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

KEKER & VAN NEST, LLP DARALYN J. DURIE - #169825 CLEMENT S. ROBERTS - #209203 RYAN M. KENT - #220441 710 Sansome Street San Francisco, CA 94111-1704 Telephone: [phone] Facsimile: [phone] Email: [e-mail]; [e-mail] Attorneys for Defendant GOOGLE, INC.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION CLICK DEFENSE INC., a Colorado corporation, Individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Plaintiffs, v. GOOGLE, INC., a Delaware corporation, and DOES 1 through 100, Inclusive, Defendants. Date: Time: Judge: Date Comp. Filed: September 2, 2005 9:00 a.m. Hon. Ronald M. Whyte June 24, 2005 Case No. C 05 02579 RMW E-FILING PROOF OF SERVICE

357186.01

PROOF OF SERVICE CASE NO. C 05 02579 RMW
Dockets.Justia.com

Case 5:05-cv-02579-RMW

Document 12

Filed 08/22/2005

Page 2 of 2

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

PROOF OF SERVICE I am employed in the City and County of San Francisco, State of California in the office of a member of the bar of this court at whose direction the following service was made. I am over the age of eighteen years and not a party to the within action. My business address is Keker & Van Nest, LLP, 710 Sansome Street, San Francisco, California 94111. On August 22, 2005, I served the following document(s): GOOGLE, INC.'S REPLY MEMORANDUM IN SUPPORT OF MOTION TO DISMISS
by regular UNITED STATES MAIL by placing a true and correct copy in a sealed envelope addressed as shown below. I am readily familiar with the practice of Keker & Van Nest, LLP for collection and processing of correspondence for mailing. According to that practice, items are deposited with the United States Postal Service at San Francisco, California on that same day with postage thereon fully prepaid. I am aware that, on motion of the party served, service is presumed invalid if the postal cancellation date or the postage meter date is more than one day after the date of deposit for mailing stated in this affidavit.

Gregory E. Keller, Esq. Darren T. Kaplan, Esq. Chitwood Harley Harnes LLP 2300 Promenade II 1230 Peachtree Street, N.E. Atlanta, GA 30309 Executed on August 22, 2005, at San Francisco, California. I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of California that the above is true and correct.

/s/ Maria V. Sundita MARIA V. SUNDITA

357186.01

PROOF OF SERVICE CASE NO. C 05 02579 RMW