Mizera v. Google

Filing 15

Mizera v. Google

Doc. 15

Case 5:05-cv-02885-RMW

Document 15

Filed 10/05/2005

Page 1 of 2

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29

RICHARD L. KELLNER, SBN 171416 FRANK E. MARCHETTI, SBN 203185 KABATECK BROWN KELLNER LLP 350 South Grand Avenue, 39th Floor Los Angeles, California 90071-3801 Telephone: [phone] Facsimile: [phone] DARREN T. KAPLAN (Admitted Pro Hac Vice) GREGORY E. KELLER (To be admitted Pro Hac Vice) CHITWOOD HARLEY HARNES LLP 2300 Promenade II 1230 Peachtree Street, NE At lanta, Georgia 30309 Telephone: [phone] Facsimile: [phone] SHAWN KHORRAMI, SBN 180411 LAW OFFICES OF SHAWN KHORRAMI 14550 Haynes Street, Third Floor Van Nuys, California 91411 Telephone: [phone] Facsimile: [phone] Attorneys for Plaintiff UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION STEVE MIZERA, An Individual, Individually ) and on behalf of all others similarly situated, ) ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) vs. ) ) GOOGLE, INC., a Delaware Corporation, and ) DOES 1 through 100, Inclusive, ) ) Defendants. ) Case No.: 5:05-cv-02885-RMW E-FILING PLAINTIFF STEVE MIZERA'S STATEMENT OF NON-OPPOSITION TO GOOGLE, INC.'S MOTION TO DISMISS Date: October 26, 2005 Time: 9:00 a.m. Judge: Hon. Ronald M. Whyte

PLAINTIFF STEVE MIZERA'S STATEMENT OF NON-OPPOSITION TO GOOGLE, INC.'S MOTION TO DISMISS
1 STATEMENT OF NON-OPPOSITION CASE NO. C-05-02885-RMW
Dockets.Justia.com

Case 5:05-cv-02885-RMW

Document 15

Filed 10/05/2005

Page 2 of 2

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29

Pursuant to Civil L.R. 7-3(b) Plaintiff Steve Mizera hereby states that he does not oppose defendant, Google, Inc.'s Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff's claim for unjust enrichment. This statement of non-opposition is consistent with plaintiff's offer, made five days prior to the service of defendant's motion, to file a second amended complaint identical to the amended complaint in all respects except for the omission of the cause of action for unjust enrichment.

Dated: October 4, 2005

Respectfully submitted, CHITWOOD HARLEY HARNES LLP By: /s/ DARREN T. KAPLAN DARREN T. KAPLAN (Admitted pro hac vice) and KABATECK BROWN KELLNER LLP and LAW OFFICES OF SHAWN KHORRAMI, Attorneys for Plaint iff

2 STATEMENT OF NON-OPPOSITION CASE NO. C-05-02885-RMW