Mizera v. Google

Filing 32

Proposed Order by Google Inc.,. (Silbert, David) (Filed on 3/29/2006)

Download PDF
Mizera v. Google Doc. 32 Case 5:05-cv-02885-RMW Document 32 Filed 03/29/2006 Page 1 of 2 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 KEKER & VAN NEST, LLP DARALYN J. DURIE - #169825 DAVID J. SILBERT - #173128 710 Sansome Street San Francisco, CA 94111-1704 Telephone: (415) 391-5400 Facsimile: (415) 397-7188 Email: ddurie@kvn.com dsilbert@kvn.com Attorneys for Defendant GOOGLE, INC. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION ADVANCED INTERNET TECHNOLOGIES, INC., a North Carolina corporation, Individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Plaintiffs, v. GOOGLE, INC., a Delaware corporation, and DOES 1 through 100, Inclusive, Defendants. STEVE MIZERA, an Individual, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Plaintiff, v. GOOGLE, INC., a Delaware corporation; and DOES 1 through 100, inclusive, Defendants. Case No. C 05 02579 RMW Consolidated with Case No. C 05 02885 RMW [PROPOSED] ORDER VACATING CLASS CERTIFICATION DATES Judge: Hon. Ronald M. Whyte June 24, 2005 Date Comp. Filed: Trial Date: None set 370059.01 [Proposed] Order Vacating Dates Case No. C 05 02579 RMW Consolidated with C 05 02885 RMW Dockets.Justia.com Case 5:05-cv-02885-RMW Document 32 Filed 03/29/2006 Page 2 of 2 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Dated: The Court has reviewed Google's Ex Parte Motion to Vacate Briefing Schedule Pending Ruling on Motion to Stay, as well as the parties' filings in support of, and in opposition to, Google's motion to stay. Good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the existing briefing and hearing dates on AIT's Motion for Class Certification are VACATED. A hearing on Google's motion to stay is set for __________________________. If AIT wishes to file additional pleadings in opposition to the motion to stay, it may do so by ___________________. If AIT files such additional pleadings, Google may file a response by ____________________. If the Court denies Google's motion to stay, it will set new dates for AIT's motion for class certification. IT IS SO ORDERED. By: ______________________ Honorable Ronald M. Whyte United States District Judge 1 370059.01 [Proposed] Order Vacating Dates Case No. C 05 02579 RMW Consolidated with C 05 02885 RMW

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?