Google, Inc. et al v. Microsoft Corporation

Filing 5

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE by Microsoft Corporation re #3 ADR Scheduling Order (Bettinger, Michael) (Filed on 8/2/2005)

Google, Inc. et al v. Microsoft Corporation

Doc. 5

Case 5:05-cv-03095-RMW

Document 5

Filed 08/02/2005

Page 1 of 2

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

MICHAEL J. BETTINGER (State Bar No. 122196) LISA MARIE SCHULL (State Bar No. 196132) PRESTON GATES & ELLIS LLP 55 Second Street, Suite 1700 San Francisco, California 94105-3493 Telephone: [phone] Facsimile: [phone] Attorneys for Defendant, MICROSOFT CORPORATION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

GOOGLE, INC. and KAI-FU LEE, Plaintiffs, v. MICROSOFT CORPORATION, and DOES 1 through 20, inclusive, Defendants.

Case No. C 05 3095 HRL CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE Case No. C 05-3095 HRL

1

Printed on Recycled Paper

Dockets.Justia.com

Case 5:05-cv-03095-RMW

Document 5

Filed 08/02/2005

Page 2 of 2

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

I, Karen Stilber, declare as follows: I am a citizen of the United States and a resident of the County of San Francisco; I am over the age of 18 years and am not a party to the within action or proceeding. I am employed by the law firm of Preston Gates & Ellis LLP, located at 55 Second Street, Suite 1700, San Francisco, California 94105. On July 29, 2005, I served the foregoing documents described as: ECF Registration Handout; Order Setting Initial Case Management Conference; Judge Lloyd Standing order re Initial Case Management; Standing Order Re Case Management in Civil Cases; Notice of Assignment of Case to a United States Magistrate Judge; Consent and Declination to Proceed Before a United States Magistrate Judge; blank Joint Case Management Conference Statement and Proposed Order; District Court guidelines; Dispute Resolution Procedures in the Northern District of California handbook; ADR instructions and blank ADR forms on the interested parties in this action by placing a true copy thereof enclosed in an envelope addressed as follows: Stephen E. Taylor, Esq. Jan J. Klohonatz, Esq. Richard B. Hardack, Esq. Taylor & Company Law Offices, Inc. One Ferry Building, Suite 355 San Francisco, CA 94111 Attorneys for Plaintiffs Michael W. Droke, Esq. Dorsey & Whitney LLP 555 California Street, Suite 1000 San Francisco, CA 94104-1513

Attorneys for Plaintiffs

[XX] (BY U.S. MAIL) I am "readily familiar" with the firm's practice of collection and processing correspondence for mailing. Under that practice it would be deposited with U.S. postal service on that same day with postage thereon fully prepaid at San Francisco, California in the ordinary course of business. I am aware that on motion of the party served, service is presumed invalid if postal cancellation date or postage meter date is more than one day after date of deposit for mailing in affidavit. Executed on July 29, 2005, at San Francisco, California. I declare that I am employed in the office of a member of the bar of this court at whose direction the service was made. /s/ KAREN STILBER

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE Case No. C 05-3095 HRL

2

Printed on Recycled Paper