Google, Inc. et al v. Microsoft Corporation

Filing 6

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE by Microsoft Corporation re 1 Notice of Removal (Bettinger, Michael) (Filed on 8/2/2005)

Download PDF
Google, Inc. et al v. Microsoft Corporation Doc. 6 Case 5:05-cv-03095-RMW Document 6 Filed 08/02/2005 Page 1 of 2 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 MICHAEL J. BETTINGER (State Bar No. 122196) LISA MARIE SCHULL (State Bar No. 196132) PRESTON GATES & ELLIS LLP 55 Second Street, Suite 1700 San Francisco, California 94105-3493 Telephone: (415) 882-8200 Facsimile: (415) 882-8220 Attorneys for Defendant, MICROSOFT CORPORATION UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA GOOGLE, INC. and KAI-FU LEE, Plaintiffs, v. MICROSOFT CORPORATION, and DOES 1 through 20, inclusive, Defendants. Case No. C 05 3095 HRL CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE Case No. C 05-3095 HRL 1 Printed on Recycled Paper Dockets.Justia.com Case 5:05-cv-03095-RMW Document 6 Filed 08/02/2005 Page 2 of 2 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 I, Karen Stilber, declare as follows: I am a citizen of the United States and a resident of the County of San Francisco; I am over the age of 18 years and am not a party to the within action or proceeding. I am employed by the law firm of Preston Gates & Ellis LLP, located at 55 Second Street, Suite 1700, San Francisco, California 94105. On July 29, 2005, I served the foregoing documents described as: NOTICE TO ADVERSE PARTY OF REMOVAL TO FEDERAL COURT on the interested parties in this action by placing a true copy thereof enclosed in an envelope addressed as follows: Stephen E. Taylor, Esq. Jan J. Klohonatz, Esq. Richard B. Hardack, Esq. Taylor & Company Law Offices, Inc. One Ferry Building, Suite 355 San Francisco, CA 94111 Attorneys for Plaintiffs Michael W. Droke, Esq. Dorsey & Whitney LLP 555 California Street, Suite 1000 San Francisco, CA 94104-1513 Attorneys for Plaintiffs [XX] (BY U.S. MAIL) I am "readily familiar" with the firm's practice of collection and processing correspondence for mailing. Under that practice it would be deposited with U.S. postal service on that same day with postage thereon fully prepaid at San Francisco, California in the ordinary course of business. I am aware that on motion of the party served, service is presumed invalid if postal cancellation date or postage meter date is more than one day after date of deposit for mailing in affidavit. Executed on July 29, 2005, at San Francisco, California. I declare that I am employed in the office of a member of the bar of this court at whose direction the service was made. /s/ KAREN STILBER CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE Case No. C 05-3095 HRL 2 Printed on Recycled Paper

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?