Goldberg v. Cameron et al

Filing 163

ORDER by Judge Whyte denying 161 Motion for Extension of Time. (rmwlc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/27/2010)

Goldberg v. Cameron et al

Doc. 163

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 United United States District Court For the Northern District of California 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
ORDER DENYING WITHOUT PREJUDICE PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME--No. C-05-03534 RMW CCL

E-FILED on

9/27/10

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION

NEIL B. GOLDBERG, Plaintiff, v. JAMES CAMERON, GALE ANN HURD, and PACIFIC WESTERN PRODUCTIONS, INC., Defendants.

No. C-05-03534 RMW ORDER DENYING WITHOUT PREJUDICE PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME [Re Docket No. 161]

The court denies plaintiff's motion for a 120-day extension of time without prejudice to considering a short extension if plaintiff files a declaration indicating that he has counsel who would take the case if the dates were to be extended. This application would have to be supplemented by a declaration by counsel committing to take the case if the dates are extended.

DATED:

9/27/10

RONALD M. WHYTE United States District Judge

Dockets.Justia.com