Goldberg v. Cameron et al

Filing 173

ORDER by Judge Whyte denying 166 Ex Parte Application to Stay Discovery. (rmwlc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/21/2010)

Goldberg v. Cameron et al

Doc. 173

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 United United States District Court For the Northern District of California 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF'S MOTION TO STAY DISCOVERY--No. C-05-03534 RMW CCL

E-FILED on

10/21/10

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION

NEIL B. GOLDBERG, Plaintiff, v. JAMES CAMERON, GALE ANN HURD, and PACIFIC WESTERN PRODUCTIONS, INC., Defendants.

No. C-05-03534 RMW ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF'S MOTION TO STAY DISCOVERY [Re Docket No. 166]

Plaintiff made a motion seeking a stay of discovery. That motion is denied. The court did indicate that it would consider a short extension of deadlines if plaintiff files a declaration indicating that he has counsel who would take the case if certain deadlines were to be extended. However, the current motion does not request an extension, short or otherwise, of any deadline. The court is not willing to stay discovery and vacate all dates as the moving papers seem to impliedly request.

DATED:

10/21/10

RONALD M. WHYTE United States District Judge

Dockets.Justia.com