Rosa et al v. City of Seaside et al
Filing
293
ORDER by Magistrate Judge Howard R. Lloyd lifting stay and denying 287 Motion for Bond. (hrllc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/9/2012)
1
*E-FILED: November 9, 2012*
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
For the Northern District of California
NOT FOR CITATION
10
United States District Court
9
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
11
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
12
SAN JOSE DIVISION
13
EVELYN ROSA ET AL.,
Plaintiffs,
14
No. C05-03577 JF (HRL)
ORDER LIFTING STAY
v.
15
[Dkt. 287]
CITY OF SEASIDE, ET AL.,
16
17
18
Defendants.
____________________________________/
In this products liability case, the Court awarded summary judgment, and then costs, to
19
defendant Taser International, Inc. (“Taser”). The Court then stayed the award of costs pending
20
appeal, on the condition that Plaintiffs would post a bond. Plaintiffs never posted the bond. Taser
21
has moved to assess costs and to require the posting of a bond (Dkt. 287), and the matter has been
22
referred to the undersigned for determination (Dkt. 292).
23
The Court held a hearing on the matter on November 6, 2012. At the hearing, Taser asked
24
the Court to lift the stay imposed on its award of costs and it asked the Court to order counsel for
25
Plaintiffs to post security for, or to pay, the amount of the award. Taser argued that counsel for
26
Plaintiffs should assume responsibility for the costs because of counsel’s prior representation to the
27
Court that his clients intended to post the bond. Upon consideration of the papers submitted with
28
this motion and the arguments made at hearing, and for the reasons stated on the record at the
1
hearing, the Court GRANTS Taser’s request to lift the stay and DENIES Taser’s request that
2
counsel for Plaintiffs be required to post security or to pay any money to Taser.
3
4
5
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: November 9, 2012
HOWARD R. LLOYD
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
6
7
8
9
For the Northern District of California
United States District Court
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
1
C05-03577 HRL Order will be electronically mailed to:
2
Christina Y. Tsou: ctsou@hurleylaw.com, gforese@hurleylaw.com
3
Christpher Mark Patti: christopher.patti@ucop.edu
4
Deborah Ann Mall: mall@ci.monterey.ca.us, moshiri@ci.monterey.ca.us
5
Holly L Gibeaut: legal@TASER.com, hgibeaut@TASER.com
6
James Glenn Bohm: jbohm@bmkalaw.com
7
Jeffrey R. Salberg: jsalberg@bmkalaw.com
8
John Burton: jb@johnburtonlaw.com, pw@johnburtonlaw.com, rt@johnburtonlaw.com,
sburton02@earthlink.net
9
John R. Maley: jmaley@btlaw.com
For the Northern District of California
United States District Court
10
Kathleen M. Anderson: kanderson@btlaw.com
11
Lee A. Wood: lwood@bmkalaw.com
12
M. Christine Davi:
davi@ci.monterey.ca.us
13
Mildred Katherine O'Linn:
mko@manningllp.com, dxf@mmker.com
14
Peter M. Williamson: pmw@wandklaw.com, tbk@wandklaw.com
15
Peter Thomas Kirchen:
pkirchen@kernwooley.com
16
17
Susan K. Blitch: sblitch@hurleylaw.com, moores@co.monterey.ca.us,
zinmank@co.monterey.ca.us
18
Thomas E. Francis: tfrancis@bmkalaw.com, ksmith@leeawoodlaw.com,
rnassar@leeawoodlaw.com
19
Thomas Vincent Perea:
tperea@bmkalaw.com
20
Traci A. Kirkbride:
kirkbrideta@co.monterey.ca.us, merillanac@co.monterey.ca.us
21
22
Vincent P. Hurley: vphurley@hurleylaw.com, gforese@hurleylaw.com,
mbrenkwitz@hurleylaw.com
23
Counsel are responsible for distributing copies of this document to co-counsel who have not
registered for e-filing under the court’s CM/ECF program.
24
25
26
27
28
3
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?