CLRB Hanson Industries, LLC et al v. Google Inc.

Filing 170

Proposed Order granting 140 Plaintiffs' Third Motion to Seal Pursuant to Civ. L.R. 79-5(d) Portions of Plaintiffs' Opposition Memorandum by Google Inc.. (Jhang, Christopher) (Filed on 5/29/2007) Modified on 5/30/2007 (cv, COURT STAFF).

CLRB Hanson Industries, LLC et al v. Google Inc.

Doc. 170

Case 5:05-cv-03649-JW

Document 170

Filed 05/29/2007

Page 1 of 2

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14

DAVID T. BIDERMAN, Bar No. 101577 JUDITH B. GITTERMAN, Bar No. 115661 M. CHRISTOPHER JHANG, Bar No. 211463 PERKINS COIE LLP Four Embarcadero Center, Suite 2400 San Francisco, CA 94111-4131 Telephone: [phone] Facsimile: [phone] Email: [e-mail] Email: [e-mail] Email: [e-mail] Attorneys for Defendant Google Inc.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, SAN JOSE DIVISION

CLRB HANSON INDUSTRIES, LLC d/b/a INDUSTRIAL PRINTING, and HOWARD STERN, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, Plaintiffs,

CASE NO. C O5-03649 JW [PROPOSED] ORDER REGARDING PLAINTIFFS' THIRD MOTION TO SEAL PURSUANT TO CIV. L.R. 79-5(d) PORTIONS OF PLAINTIFFS' OPPOSITION MEMORANDUM (DOCUMENT NOS. 140-142) Date: Time: Dept.: Judge: June 11, 2007 9:00 a.m. Courtroom 8 Honorable James Ware

15 v. 16 GOOGLE, INC., 17 Defendant. 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
[PROPOSED] ORDER CASE NO. 05-03649
41063-0023/LEGAL13278113.1

[41063-0023-000000/13278113_1.DOC]

Dockets.Justia.com

Case 5:05-cv-03649-JW

Document 170

Filed 05/29/2007

Page 2 of 2

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
[PROPOSED] ORDER CASE NO. 05-03649
41063-0023/LEGAL13278113.1

ORDER The Court finds, having considered Plaintiffs CLRB Hanson Industries, LLC, d/b/a Industrial Printing, and Howard Stern's Third Motion To Seal Pursuant to Civ. L.R. 79-5(d) Portions Of Plaintiffs' Opposition Memorandum Due To Confidentiality Designations By Defendant Google Inc. ("Plaintiffs' Third Motion to Seal Document") (Document Nos. 140142), the Declaration of M. Christopher Jhang In Response To Plaintiffs' Third Motion to Seal Document, and the papers submitted therewith and arguments raised therein, and good cause appearing: 1. That the redactions (i.e., sealing as confidential documents) requested in

Plaintiffs' Third Motion to Seal Document, in connection with Plaintiffs' Memorandum In Opposition to Defendant Google Inc.'s Supplemental Brief in Support of Summary Judgment Motion ("Plaintiffs' Supplemental Opposition Memorandum"), include information and testimony that Google has designated confidential; and 2. That Google has demonstrated that Plaintiffs' Supplemental Opposition

Memorandum is subject to seal because of overriding confidentiality interests that overcome the right of public access to the record in these documents. IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED: 1. That Plaintiffs' Third Motion to Seal Document is GRANTED.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

DATED: ___________________ The Honorable James Ware United States District Judge

-2[41063-0023-000000/13278113_1.DOC]