CLRB Hanson Industries, LLC et al v. Google Inc.

Filing 183

Proposed Order denying re [ 179 by CLRB Hanson Industries, LLC, Howard Stern. (Raphael, Michele) (Filed on 6/15/2007) Modified text on 6/15/2007, (counsel failed to properly link) (cv, COURT STAFF).

CLRB Hanson Industries, LLC et al v. Google Inc.

Doc. 183

Case 5:05-cv-03649-JW

Document 183

Filed 06/15/2007

Page 1 of 2

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

Lester L. Levy (Admitted Pro Hac Vice) Michele F. Raphael (Admitted Pro Hac Vice) WOLF POPPER LLP 845 Third Avenue New York NY 10022 Telephone: [phone] Facsimile: 212.486.2093 e-mail: [e-mail] e-mail: [e-mail] William M. Audet (SBN 117456) Audet & Partners, LLP 221 Main Street, Suite 1460 San Francisco, CA 94105-1938 Telephone: [phone] Facsimile: 415.568.2556 e-mail: [e-mail] Attorneys for Plaintiffs and the Proposed Class UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION CLRB HANSON INDUSTRIES, LLC d/b/a INDUSTRIAL PRINTING, and HOWARD STERN, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, Plaintiffs, vs. GOOGLE, INC., Defendant. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CASE NO: C05-03649 JW [PROPOSED] ORDER DENYING DEFENDANT GOOGLE INC.'S ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE A DOCUMENT (THE JOINT STATEMENT OF UNDISPUTED FACTS) UNDER SEAL Civil L. R. 79-11 Civil L. R. 79-5 Courtroom: 8 Judge: Hon. James W. Ware

[PROPOSED] ORDER DENYING DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO FILE A DOCUMENT (THE JOINT STATEMENT OF UNDISPUTED FACTS) UNDER SEAL
Doc. 157625

Dockets.Justia.com

Case 5:05-cv-03649-JW

Document 183

Filed 06/15/2007

Page 2 of 2

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

Defendant Google Inc. has made an Administrative Motion for Leave to File A Document Under Seal Pursuant to Civ. L.R. 79-5, dated June 12, 2007. Google seeks to file the Joint Statement of Undisputed Facts under seal. The Court has duly considered the submissions and arguments of counsel for both parties and finds that there is no good cause to grant Google's request to file said document under seal. Google has not shown that it possesses overriding confidentiality interests that overcome the right of public access to the record nor to support sealing this document. Nor has Google shown that it is likely to be prejudiced nor irreparably harmed. Google's requested sealing does not comport with the parties' confidentiality stipulation. IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that Google's Administrative Motion for Leave to File A Document Under Seal, dated June 12, 2007, is DENIED.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: June __, 2007

_________________________________________ The Honorable James Ware United States District Court Judge

[PROPOSED] ORDER DENYING DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO FILE A DOCUMENT (THE JOINT STATEMENT OF UNDISPUTED FACTS) UNDER SEAL
Doc. 157625

2