CLRB Hanson Industries, LLC et al v. Google Inc.

Filing 261

Declaration of R. S. Black (UNDER SEAL) (cv, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/10/2008)

Download PDF
CLRB Hanson Industries, LLC et al v. Google Inc. Doc. 261 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Marshall, Gerstein & Borun LLP 6300 Sears Tower 233 South Wacker Drive Chicago, IL 60606-6357 MARSHALL, GERSTEIN & BORUN LLP 6300 Sears Tower 233 South Wacker Drive Chicago, IL 60606-6357 ROBINS, KAPLAN, MILLER & CIRESI LLP 2800 Lasalle Plaza, 800 Lasalle Avenue Minneapolis, Minnesota 55402 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION In Re ACACIA MEDIA TECHNOLOGIES CORPORATION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Case No. C-05-01114JW SUBMISSION IN RESPONSE TO REQUEST FOR ADDITIONAL BRIEFING IDENTIFYING THE ESSENTIAL COMPONENTS OF THE PATENTEEDEFINED "TRANSMISSION SYSTEM" AND "RECEIVING SYSTEM" Courtroom: Place: 8, 4th Floor Honorable James Ware 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Dockets.Justia.com 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Marshall, Gerstein & Borun LLP 6300 Sears Tower 233 South Wacker Drive Chicago, IL 60606-6357 STATEMENT The Court's October 19, 2007, Claim Construction Order requested additional briefing on the construction of "transmission system" and "receiving system." In response, the following Round Two Cable Defendants join in the arguments presented by the Round Three Defendants in a separately-filed submission: Charter Communications, Inc.; Wide Open West Ohio LLC; Armstrong Group; Massilon Cable TV, Inc.; East Cleveland Cable TV and Communications LLC; MidContinent Media, Inc.; Cannon Valley Communications, Inc.; Us Cable Holdings, LP; Arvig Communications Systems; Sjoberg's Cablevision, Inc.; Loretel Cablevision, Inc.; NPG Cable, Inc.; Block Communications, Inc.; Coxcom, Inc.; and Hospitality Network, Inc. 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Marshall, Gerstein & Borun LLP 6300 Sears Tower 233 South Wacker Drive Chicago, IL 60606-6357 Respectfully Submitted, Dated: November 2, 2007 BRADFORD LYERLA (pro hac vice) KEVIN HOGG (pro hac vice) JEFFREY DEAN (pro hac vice) JON-THOMAS BLOCH (pro hac vice) MARSHALL, GERSTEIN & BORUN LLP 6300 Sears Tower 233 South Wacker Drive Chicago, Illinois 60606-6357 MORGAN W. TOVEY (CA SBN 136242) WILLIAM R. OVEREND (CA SBN 180209) REED SMITH LLP Two Embarcadero Center, Suite 2000 San Francisco, CA 94111 By /s/ Jon-Thomas Bloch Jon-Thomas Bloch 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Attorneys for Defendants CHARTER COMMUNICATIONS, INC.; WIDE OPEN WEST OHIO LLC; ARMSTRONG GROUP; MASSILON CABLE TV, INC.; EAST CLEVELAND CABLE TV AND COMMUNICATIONS LLC; MID-CONTINENT MEDIA, INC.; CANNON VALLEY COMMUNICATIONS, INC.; US CABLE HOLDINGS, LP; ARVIG COMMUNICATIONS SYSTEMS; SJOBERG'S CABLEVISION, INC.; LORETEL CABLEVISION, INC.; NPG CABLE, INC.; and BLOCK COMMUNICATIONS, INC. ANNAMARIE A. DALEY (pro hac vice) ROBINS, KAPLAN, MILLER & CIRESI LLP 2800 LaSalle Plaza, 800 LaSalle Avenue Minneapolis, Minnesota 55402 RICHARD R. PATCH (CA SBN 88049) J. TIMOTHY NARDELL (CA SBN 184444) COBLENTZ, PATCH, DUFFY & BASS, LLP One Ferry Building, Suite 200 San Francisco, California 94111-4213 By /s/ Annamarie A. Daley Annamarie A. Daley Attorneys for Defendants COXCOM, INC. and HOSPITALITY NETWORK, INC. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Marshall, Gerstein & Borun LLP 6300 Sears Tower 233 South Wacker Drive Chicago, IL 60606-6357 PROOF OF SERVICE I hereby certify that on November 2, 2007, I caused the following document: SUBMISSION IN RESPONSE TO REQUEST FOR ADDITIONAL BRIEFING IDENTIFYING THE ESSENTIAL COMPONENTS OF THE PATENTEE-DEFINED "TRANSMISSION SYSTEM" AND "RECEIVING SYSTEM", to be filed electronically with the Clerk of Court through ECF, and that ECF will send an enotice of the electronic filing to counsel of record for all parties via Court's ECF system on November 2, 2007. /s/ Jon-Thomas Bloch Jon-Thomas Bloch 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?