CLRB Hanson Industries, LLC et al v. Google Inc.

Filing 270

ORDER Granting 266 Motion to Seal. Signed by Judge James Ware on 11/18/2008. (ecg, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/18/2008)

CLRB Hanson Industries, LLC et al v. Google Inc.

Doc. 270

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

DAVID T. BIDERMAN, Bar No. 101577 TIMOTHY J. FRANKS, Bar No. 197645 M. CHRISTOPHER JHANG, Bar No. 211463 FARSCHAD FARZAN, Bar No. 215194 PERKINS COIE LLP Four Embarcadero Center, Suite 2400 San Francisco, California 94111 Telephone: [phone] Facsimile: [phone] Email: [e-mail] Email: [e-mail] Email: [e-mail] Email: [e-mail] Attorneys for Defendant GOOGLE INC.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, SAN JOSE DIVISION

CLRB HANSON INDUSTRIES, LLC d/b/a INDUSTRIAL PRINTING, and HOWARD STERN, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, Plaintiffs, v. GOOGLE INC., Defendant.

CASE NO. C 05-03649 JW [PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING GOOGLE INC.'S ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE UNDER SEAL ITS REPLY IN SUPPORT OF ITS MOTION FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT ON PLAINTIFFS' "120% RULE" AND "PARTIAL MONTH" CLAIMS Date: Time: Place: Judge: December 1, 2008 9:00 a.m. Courtroom 8 Honorable James Ware

[PROPOSED] ORDER CASE NO. 05-03649 JW
Dockets.Justia.com

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

Defendant Google Inc.'s ("Google's") Administrative Motion for Leave to File Under Seal Documents in Connection with Its Reply in Support of Its Motion for Partial Summary Judgment on Plaintiffs' "120% Rule" and "Partial Month" Claims (the "Motion") was heard before this Court on December 1, 2008 at 9:00 a.m. Upon consideration of this Motion and the supporting Declaration of Farschad Farzan filed therewith, the Court finds there is good cause to grant Google's request to file the following documents and information under seal: Google Inc.'s Reply in Support of Its Motion for Partial Summary Judgment on Plaintiffs' "120% Rule" and "Partial Month" Claims, and Exhibits 6 and 7 to the Declaration of Farschad Farzan in Support of Google Inc.'s Reply in Support of Its Motion for Partial Summary Judgment on Plaintiffs' "120% Rule" and "Partial Month" Claims. GOOD CAUSE having been shown, the Court finds that: (1) The parties possess overriding confidentiality interests that overcome the right of

public access to the record in the above-mentioned document; (2) (3) The parties' overriding confidentiality interests support sealing the record; A substantial probability exists that the parties' overriding confidentiality interests

will be prejudiced if the record is not sealed; (4) (5) The proposed sealing is narrowly tailored; and No less restrictive means exist to achieve this overriding interest.

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that Google's Motion is GRANTED.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

November 18, 2008 DATED: ___________________

The Honorable James Ware United States District Judge

41063-0023/LEGAL14928817.1

-2[PROPOSED] ORDER CASE NO. 05-03649 JW