CLRB Hanson Industries, LLC et al v. Google Inc.

Filing 290

Proposed Order re 284 MOTION to Seal Portions of Documents Due to Confidential Designations by Google Inc.. (Farzan, Farschad) (Filed on 12/4/2008) Modified text on 12/5/2008 (cv, COURT STAFF).

CLRB Hanson Industries, LLC et al v. Google Inc.

Doc. 290

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

DAVID T. BIDERMAN, Bar No. 101577 TIMOTHY J. FRANKS, Bar No. 197645 M. CHRISTOPHER JHANG, Bar No. 211463 FARSCHAD FARZAN, Bar No. 215194 PERKINS COIE LLP Four Embarcadero Center, Suite 2400 San Francisco, California 94111 Telephone: [phone] Facsimile: [phone] Email: [e-mail] Email: [e-mail] Email: [e-mail] Email: [e-mail] Attorneys for Defendant GOOGLE INC.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION

CLRB HANSON INDUSTRIES, LLC d/b/a INDUSTRIAL PRINTING, and HOWARD STERN, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, Plaintiffs, v. GOOGLE INC., Defendant.

CASE NO. C 05-03649 JW [PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFFS' ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION UNDER LOCAL RULE 79-5(d) FOR LEAVE TO FILE UNDER SEAL PORTIONS OF DOCUMENTS DUE TO CONFIDENTIAL DESIGNATIONS BY DEFENDANT GOOGLE, INC. Date: January 6, 2009 Time: 10:00 a.m. Place: Courtroom 5 Judge: Honorable Patricia V. Trumbull

[PROPOSED] ORDER CASE NO. 05-03649 JW
41063-0023/LEGAL15004940.1

Dockets.Justia.com

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

Plaintiffs' Administrative Motion Under Local Rule 79-5(d) for Leave to File Under Seal Portions of Documents Due to Confidential Designations by Defendant Google, Inc. (the "Motion") was filed on November 26, 2008. Upon consideration of the Motion and the Declaration of David T. Biderman filed in support thereof, the Court finds there is good cause to grant the request to file the following document and information under seal: Plaintiffs' Motion to Compel Google, Inc.'s Answer to Interrogatories No. 4 and 5 and to Produce Documents in Response to Request for Production No. 29, and Exhibit 6 to the Declaration of Rachel S. Black in Support of Plaintiffs' Motion to Compel Google, Inc.'s Answer to Interrogatories No. 4 and 5 and to Produce Documents in Response to Request for Production No. 29. GOOD CAUSE having been shown, the Court finds that: (1) The parties possess overriding confidentiality interests that overcome the right of

public access to the record in the above-mentioned documents; (2) (3) The parties' overriding confidentiality interests support sealing the record; A substantial probability exists that the parties' overriding confidentiality interests

will be prejudiced if the record is not sealed; (4) (5) The proposed sealing is narrowly tailored; and No less restrictive means exist to achieve this overriding interest.

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that Plaintiffs' Motion is GRANTED. IT IS SO ORDERED.

DATED: ___________________

The Honorable Patricia V. Trumbull United States Magistrate Judge

-2[PROPOSED] ORDER CASE NO. 05-03649 JW
41063-0023/LEGAL15004940.1