CLRB Hanson Industries, LLC et al v. Google Inc.

Filing 353

USCA Case Number 09-17380 9th Circuit Court of Appeals for 350 Notice of Appeal filed by Matthew Weiss. The schedule is set as follows: CADS due by Attorney Alan J. Sherwood due on 10/14/2009. Transcript due for Orig Clerk USDC, San Jose on 12/14/2009. Certificate of record due 12/21/2009. Appellant Weiss & Associates, PC opening brief due 01/29/2010. Appellee CLRB Hanson Industries, LLC, Appellee Google Inc. and Appellee Howard Stern answering brief due 03/01/2010. Appellant's optional reply brief is due 14 days after service of the answering brief. (cv, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/27/2009)

CLRB Hanson Industries, LLC et al v. Google Inc.

Doc. 353

A-11 (rev. 7/00)

Case5:05-cv-03649-JW Document353

Filed10/27/09 Page1 of 5

Page 1 of 2

U S C A DOCKET # (IF KNOWN)

U N I T E D STATES COURT OF APPEALS FO R TH E NINTH CIRCUIT C I V IL APPEALS DOCKETING STATEMENT
P L E AS E ATTACH ADDITIONAL PAGES IF NECESSARY. T I T L E IN FULL: D I S T R IC T : D I S T R I C T COURT NUM B E R : D A T E N O T I C E OF AP P E A L FILE D: JUDGE:

I S THIS A CROSS-APPEAL?

9 YES

I F THIS MATTER HAS BEEN BEFORE THIS COURT PREVIOUSLY, P L E A S E PR O V I D E TH E D O C K E T N U M B E R AND CIT A T I O N (IF ANY ) :

B R I E F D E S CR IP TI O N OF NA T U R E OF AC T I O N AN D R E S UL T B E L O W :

P R I N C I P A L ISSUES PROPO S E D TO BE RAISED ON A P P E A L :

P L E A SE IDENTIFY ANY OTHER LEGAL PROCEEDING THAT MAY HAVE A BEARING ON THIS CASE (INCLUDE P E N D I N G DISTR I C T C O U R T P O S T J U D G M E N T M O T I O N S ) :

D O E S THIS APPEAL INVOLVE ANY OF THE FOLLOWING:

9 9 9 9

Possibility of settlement Likelihood that intervening precedent will control outcome of appeal Likelihood of a motion to expedite or to stay the appeal, or other procedural matters (Specify) Any other information relevant to the inclusion of this case in the Mediation Program

9
Possibility parties would stipulate to binding award by Appellate Commissioner in lieu of submission to judges LOWER COURT INFORMATION
Dockets.Justia.com

Case5:05-cv-03649-JW Document353
J U R IS D IC T I O N FEDERAL APPELLATE

Filed10/27/09 Page2 of 5
D I ST R I CT COURT DISPOSITION

Page 2 of 2

TYPE OF JUDGMENT/ORDER APPEALED

RELIEF

9 9 9

FEDERAL QUESTION

9 9 9

FINAL DECISION OF DISTRICT COURT

DIVERSITY

OTHER (SPECIFY):

INTERLOCUTORY DECISION APPEALABLE AS OF RIGHT

INTERLOCUTORY ORDER CERTIFIED BY DISTRICT JUDGE (SPECIFY):

9

OTHER (SPECIFY):

9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9

DEFAULT JUDGMENT DISMISSAL/JURISDICTION DISMISSAL/MERITS SUMMARY JUDGMENT JUDGMENT/COURT DECISION JUDGMENT/JURY VERDICT DECLARATORY JUDGMENT JUDGMENT AS A MATTER OF LAW OTHER (SPECIFY):

9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9

DAMAGES: SOUGHT $ AWARDED $ INJUNCTIONS: PRELIMINARY PERMANENT GRANTED DENIED

ATTORNEY FEES: SOUGHT $ AWARDED $ PENDING COSTS: $

CERTIFICATION OF COUNSEL
I CERTIFY THAT: 1. COPIES OF ORDER/JUDGMENT APPEALED FROM ARE ATTACHED. 2. A CURRENT SERVICE LIST OR REPRESENTATION STATEMENT WITH TELEPHONE AND FAX NUMBERS IS ATTACHED (SEE 9TH CIR. RULE 3-2). A COPY OF THIS CIVIL APPEALS DOCKETING STATEMENT WAS SERVED IN COMPLIANCE WITH FRAP 25. I UNDERSTAND THAT FAILURE TO COMPLY WITH THESE FILING REQUIREMENTS MAY RESULT IN SANCTIONS, INCLUDING DISMISSAL OF THIS APPEAL.

3. 4.

Signature

Date

COUNSEL WHO COMPLETED THIS FORM
NAME: FIRM: ADDRESS: E-MAIL: TELEPHONE: FAX:

x THIS DOCUMENT SHOULD BE FILED IN THE DISTRICT COURT WITH THE NOTICE OF APPEALx x IF FILED LATE, IT SHOULD BE FILED DIRECTLY WITH THE U.S. COURT OF APPEALSx

Case5:05-cv-03649-JW Document353

Filed10/27/09 Page3 of 5

M o lly C . D w y e r C l e r k of C o u r t

O f fic e of the Clerk U n ited States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit 9 5 Seventh Street P o st Office Box 193939 S an Francisco, California 94119-3939 O cto b er 27, 2009 C A 9 Docket No.: A g en cy Number: S h o rt Title: 0 9 -1 7 3 8 0 5 :0 5 - c v - 0 3 6 4 9 - J W C L R B Hanson Industries, LLC, et al v. Weiss & Associates, PC

[phone]

D ear Counsel: A copy of your notice of appeal/petition has been received in the Clerk's office of th e United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. T h e U.S. Court of Appeals docket number shown above has been assigned to this case. You must indicate this Court of Appeals docket number whenever you c o m m u n ic ate with this court regarding this case. Please furnish this docket n u m b e r immediately to the court reporter if you place an order, or have placed an o r d e r , for portions of the trial transcripts. The court reporter will need this docket n u m b er when communicating with this court. T h e due dates for designating and filing the reporter's transcript, if a p p lica b le, filing the parties' briefs and otherwise perfecting the appeal have b een set by the enclosed "Time Schedule Order," pursuant to applicable F R A P rules. These dates can be extended only by court order. Failure of the a p p ella n t to comply with the time schedule order will result in automatic d ism issa l of the appeal. 9th Cir. R. 42-1. T h e following information is being provided in an attempt to answer the most freq u en tly asked questions regarding the appellate process. Please review this in fo rm atio n very carefully. For convenience, we use the term "Circuit Rules" in stead of "Rules of the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit" and "F R A P " instead of "Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure." E n c lo s e d with this letter is an appellate processing schedule along with a case p r o c e ss in g checklist to help you monitor the progress of your case. A p p ella n ts/P etitio n ers who are filing pro se should refer to the accompanying in fo rm a tio n sheet regarding the filing of informal briefs.

Case5:05-cv-03649-JW Document353

Filed10/27/09 Page4 of 5

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS F O R THE NINTH CIRCUIT

F IL E D
OCT 27 2009

M O L L Y C . D W YE R , C LE R K O F C O U R T U . S . C O U R T OF APPE A L S

C L R B HANSON INDUSTRIES, LLC, D B A Industrial Printing; HOWARD S T E R N , on behalf of themselves and all o th ers similarly situated, Plaintiffs - Appellees, V. W E IS S & ASSOCIATES, PC, Objector - Appellant, V. G O O G L E INC., Defendant - Appellee..

N o . 09-17380 D .C . No. 5:05-cv-03649-JW N o r th e r n District of California, S an Jose T IM E SCHEDULE ORDER

T h e parties shall meet the following time schedule:

W ed ., October 14, 2009

A p p ellan t/p etitio n er shall immediately file the civil ap p eals docketing statement (CADS), pursuant to C ircu it Rule 33-1; C o u rt reporter shall file transcript in the district court, p u rsu an t to FRAP 11(b) and 9th Cir. R. 11-1.1; A p p ellan t/p etitio n er's opening brief and excerpts of reco rd shall be served and filed pursuant to FRAP 32 an d 9th Cir. R. 32-1;

M o n ., December 14, 2009

F ri., January 29, 2010

Case5:05-cv-03649-JW Document353

Filed10/27/09 Page5 of 5

Mon., March 1, 2010

T h e brief of appellee/respondent shall be filed and s er v e d , pursuant to FRAP 32 and 9th Cir. R. 32-1

T h e optional appellant/petitioner reply brief shall be filed and served within fo u rteen days of service of the appellee/respondent's brief, pursuant to FRAP 3 2 and 9th Cir. R. 32-1. F a ilu re of the appellant to comply with the Time Schedule Order will result in a u t o m a t ic dismissal of the appeal. 9th Cir. R. 42-1 A p p ella n ts/P etitio n ers without representation of counsel in a prisoner appeal m a y have their case submitted on the briefs and record without oral a rg u m en t, pursuant to FRAP 34(a). Within 10 days of the filing of the a p p ella n t's opening brief, parties may file a statement setting forth the rea so n s why, in the opinion of the parties, oral argument should be heard.

F O R THE COURT: M o lly C. Dwyer C le rk of Court

G e ra ld Rosen D e p u ty Clerk