CLRB Hanson Industries, LLC et al v. Google Inc.

Filing 53

Proposed Order re 52 First MOTION to Dismiss Plaintiffs' Unjust Enrichment Claim in the Second Amended Complaint by Google Inc.. (Jhang, Christopher) (Filed on 5/18/2006)

CLRB Hanson Industries, LLC et al v. Google Inc.

Doc. 53

Case 5:05-cv-03649-JW

Document 53

Filed 05/18/2006

Page 1 of 3

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

DAVID T. BIDERMAN, Bar No. 101577 JUDITH B. GITTERMAN, Bar No. 115661 M. CHRISTOPHER JHANG, Bar No. 211463 PERKINS COIE LLP 180 Townsend Street, 3rd Floor San Francisco, California 94107-1909 Telephone: [phone] Facsimile: [phone] Email: [e-mail] Email: [e-mail] Email: [e-mail] Attorneys for Defendant Google, Inc.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, SAN JOSE DIVISION
CLRB HANSON INDUSTRIES, LLC d/b/a INDUSTRIAL PRINTING, and HOWARD STERN, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, Plaintiff, v. GOOGLE, INC., Defendant. CASE NO. C 05-03649 JW [PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT GOOGLE, INC.'S MOTION TO DISMISS PLAINTIFFS' UNJUST ENRICHMENT CLAIM IN THE SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(6) Date: Time: Place: Judge: June 26, 2006 9:00 a.m. Courtroom 8 Honorable James Ware

[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT GOOGLE, INC.'S MOTION TO DISMISS PLAINTIFFS' UNJUST ENRICHMENT CLAIM IN THE SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT CASE NO: C 05-03649 JW

[41063-0023/BY061380.027]

Dockets.Justia.com

Case 5:05-cv-03649-JW

Document 53

Filed 05/18/2006

Page 2 of 3

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

Defendant Google, Inc.'s Motion to Dismiss Plaintiffs' Unjust Enrichment Claim in the Second Amended Complaint, brought pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6), having come on for hearing, the Court having considered all relevant documents and evidence and having considered the arguments of counsel, and good cause appearing therefor: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Defendant's Motion to Dismiss Plaintiffs' Unjust Enrichment Claim in the Second Amended Complaint is granted and plaintiffs' claim for unjust enrichment is dismissed, without leave to amend, pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6). DATED: ______________, 2006 Honorable James Ware U.S.D.C., Northern District of California Respectfully submitted: PERKINS COIE LLP By ___________/s/_______________ David T. Biderman Attorneys for Defendant Google, Inc.

-2[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT GOOGLE, INC.'S MOTION TO DISMISS PLAINTIFFS' UNJUST ENRICHMENT CLAIM IN THE SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT CASE NO: C 05-03649 JW

[41063-0023/BY061380.027]

Case 5:05-cv-03649-JW

Document 53

Filed 05/18/2006

Page 3 of 3

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 DATED: May 18, 2006. I, Susan E. Daniels, declare:

PROOF OF SERVICE

I am a citizen of the United States and am employed in the County of San Francisco, State of California. I am over the age of 18 years and am not a party to the within action. My business address is Perkins Coie LLP, 180 Townsend Street, 3rd Floor, San Francisco, California 94107-1909. I am personally familiar with the business practice of Perkins Coie LLP. On May 18, 2006, I served the following document(s): [PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT GOOGLE, INC.'S MOTION TO DISMISS PLAINTIFFS' UNJUST ENRICHMENT CLAIM IN THE SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT by placing a true copy thereof enclosed in a sealed envelope addressed to the following parties: William M. Audet, Esq. Ryan M. Hagan, Esq. Jason Baker, Esq. ALEXANDER, HAWES & AUDET, LLP 152 North Third Street, Suite 600 San Jose, CA 95112 Tel: [phone]; Fax: [phone] Lester L. Levy, Esq. Michele F. Raphael, Esq. Renee L. Karalian, Esq. WOLF POPPER LLP 845 Third Avenue New York, NY 10022 Tel: [phone]; Fax: [phone] Attorney for Plaintiffs and the Proposed Class

Attorney for Plaintiffs and the Proposed Class

XXX (By Mail) I caused each envelope with postage fully prepaid to be placed for collection and mailing following the ordinary business practices of Perkins Coie LLP. I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of California that the above is true and correct and that this declaration was executed at San Francisco, California.

/S/ Susan E. Daniels

[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT GOOGLE, INC.'S MOTION TO DISMISS PLAINTIFFS' UNJUST ENRICHMENT CLAIM IN THE SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT CASE NO: C 05-03649 JW

[41063-0023/BY061380.027]