CLRB Hanson Industries, LLC et al v. Google Inc.

Filing 55

Proposed Order Denying Defendant Google, Inc.'s Motion to Dismiss Plaintiffs' Unjust Enrichment Claim in the Second Amended Complaint by CLRB Hanson Industries, LLC, Howard Stern. (Raphael, Michele) (Filed on 6/5/2006)

CLRB Hanson Industries, LLC et al v. Google Inc.

Doc. 55

Case 5:05-cv-03649-JW

Document 55

Filed 06/05/2006

Page 1 of 2

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

Lester L. Levy (Admitted Pro Hac Vice) Michele F. Raphael (Admitted Pro Hac Vice) WOLF POPPER LLP 845 Third Avenue New York NY 10022 Telephone: [phone] Facsimile: 212.486.2093 e-mail: [e-mail] e-mail: [e-mail] William M. Audet (SBN 117456) Jason Baker (SBN 212380) ALEXANDER, HAWES & AUDET, LLP 152 North Third Street, Suite 600 San Jose, CA 95112 Telephone: [phone] Facsimile: 408.287.1776 e-mail: [e-mail] e-mail: [e-mail] Attorneys for Plaintiffs and the Proposed Class UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION CLRB HANSON INDUSTRIES, LLC d/b/a INDUSTRIAL PRINTING, and HOWARD STERN, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, Plaintiffs, vs. GOOGLE, INC., Defendant. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CASE NO: C05-03649 JW [PROPOSED] ORDER DENYING DEFENDANT GOOGLE, INC.'S MOTION TO DISMISS PLAINTIFFS' UNJUST ENRICHMENT CLAIM IN THE SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT Date: June 26, 2006 Time: 9:00 a.m. Place: Courtroom 8 Judge: Honorable James Ware

[Proposed] Order Denying Defendant Google, Inc.'s Motion to Dismiss Plaintiffs' Unjust Enrichment Claim in the Second Amended Complaint Case No: C05-03649 JW
Doc. 153162

Dockets.Justia.com

Case 5:05-cv-03649-JW

Document 55

Filed 06/05/2006

Page 2 of 2

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

Defendant Google, Inc.'s Motion to Dismiss Plaintiffs' Unjust Enrichment Claim in the Second Amended Complaint, brought pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6), having come on for hearing, the Court having considered all relevant documents and evidence and having considered the arguments of counsel, and good cause appearing therefor: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Defendant's Motion to Dismiss Plaintiffs' Unjust Enrichment Claim in the Second Amended Complaint is denied. Dated: ___________________, 2006 _________________________________________ Honorable James Ware U.S.D.C., Northern District of California

Respectfully submitted: WOLF POPPER LLP By: /s/ Michele F. Raphael Michele F. Raphael Attorneys for Plaintiffs and the Proposed Class

[Proposed] Order Denying Defendant Google, Inc.'s Motion to Dismiss Plaintiffs' Unjust Enrichment Claim in the Second Amended Complaint Case No: C05-03649 JW
Doc. 153162

2