CLRB Hanson Industries, LLC et al v. Google Inc.
Filing
57
*** FILED IN ERROR *** (Please see corrected/amended ORDER 58 ) VACATING HEARING (jwlc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/20/2006) Modified on 6/21/2006 (cv, COURT STAFF).
CLRB Hanson Industries, LLC et al v. Google Inc.
Doc. 57
Case 5:05-cv-03649-JW
Document 57
Filed 06/20/2006
Page 1 of 2
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION CLRB Hanson Industries, LLC d/b/a Industrial Printing, and Howard Stern, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, v. Google Inc., Defendant. / Plaintiffs, NO. C 05-03649 JW ORDER VACATING HEARING ON DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO DISMISS PLAINTIFFS' UNJUST ENRICHMENT CLAIM IN THE SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT
United United States District Court
11
For the Northern District of California
12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
The Court deems Defendant's Motion to Dismiss Plaintiffs' Unjust Enrichment Claim in the Second Amended Complaint in the above entitled matter appropriate for submission on the papers. See Civ. L.R. 7-1(b). Accordingly, the hearing on January 26, 2006 is vacated.
Dated: June 20, 2006
JAMES WARE United States District Judge
Dockets.Justia.com
Case 5:05-cv-03649-JW
Document 57
Filed 06/20/2006
Page 2 of 2
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
THIS IS TO CERTIFY THAT COPIES OF THIS ORDER HAVE BEEN DELIVERED TO: Christopher M. Jhang cjhang@perkinscoie.com David T. Biderman dbiderman@perkinscoie.com Judith B. Gitterman gittj@perkinscoie.com Lester L Levy llevy@wolfpopper.com Lisa Delehunt ldelehunt@perkinscoie.com Michele Fried Raphael mraphael@wolfpopper.com Ryan M. Hagan rhagan@alexanderlaw.com William M. Audet waudet@alexanderlaw.com
Dated: June 20, 2006
Richard W. Wieking, Clerk By: /s/ JW Chambers Melissa Peralta Courtroom Deputy
United States District Court
11
For the Northern District of California
12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?