CLRB Hanson Industries, LLC et al v. Google Inc.

Filing 82

Proposed Order re 80 MOTION for Partial Summary Judgment by CLRB Hanson Industries, LLC, Howard Stern. (Raphael, Michele) (Filed on 9/29/2006)

Download PDF
CLRB Hanson Industries, LLC et al v. Google Inc. Doc. 82 Case 5:05-cv-03649-JW Document 82 Filed 09/29/2006 Page 1 of 2 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Lester L. Levy (Admitted Pro Hac Vice) Michele F. Raphael (Admitted Pro Hac Vice) WOLF POPPER LLP 845 Third Avenue New York NY 10022 Telephone: 212.759.4600 Facsimile: 212.486.2093 e-mail: llevy@wolfpopper.com e-mail: mraphael@wolfpopper.com William M. Audet (SBN 117456) Jason Baker (SBN 212380) ALEXANDER, HAWES & AUDET, LLP 152 North Third Street, Suite 600 San Jose, CA 95112 Telephone: 408.289.1776 Facsimile: 408.287.1776 e-mail: waudet@alexanderlaw.com e-mail: jbaker@alexanderlaw.com Attorneys for Plaintiffs and the Proposed Class UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION CLRB HANSON INDUSTRIES, LLC d/b/a INDUSTRIAL PRINTING, and HOWARD STERN, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, Plaintiffs, vs. GOOGLE, INC., Defendant. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CASE NO: C05-03649 JW [PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFFS' MOTION FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT AND ENJOINING IMPROPER BILLING PRACTICES Fed. R. Civ. P. 56 Date: Time: Dept.: Judge: November 6, 2006 9:00 a.m. 3 Honorable James W. Ware [PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFFS' MOTION FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT AND ENJOINING IMPROPER BILLING PRACTICES Case No: C05-03649 JW Doc. 154627 Dockets.Justia.com Case 5:05-cv-03649-JW Document 82 Filed 09/29/2006 Page 2 of 2 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Plaintiffs' Motion for Partial Summary Judgment on liability as to their claims for Defendant's violation of California Business and Professions Code 17200 et seq.; violation of California Business and Professions Code 17500 et seq. and for unjust enrichment, brought pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 56, having come on for hearing, the Court having considered all relevant documents and evidence and having considered the arguments of counsel, and good cause appearing therefor: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiffs' Motion for Partial Summary Judgment is granted, this Court finding that Defendant violated California Business and Professions Code 17200 and 17500 and unjustly benefitted thereby. As Defendant's improper practices are continuing, Defendant is enjoined from advertising or promoting its AdWords program as allowing an advertiser to set a daily budget and control its costs and then billing in excess of the daily budget for days the ad is active. Dated: ___________________, 2006 _________________________________________ Honorable James W. Ware U.S.D.C., Northern District of California Respectfully submitted: WOLF POPPER LLP By: /s/ Michele F. Raphael (Admitted Pro Hac Vice) Attorneys for Plaintiffs and the Proposed Class [PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFFS' MOTION FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT AND ENJOINING IMPROPER BILLING PRACTICES Case No: C05-03649 JW Doc. 154627 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?